Current Status and Outcomes of Critical Traumatic Brain Injury (GCS = 3-5) in a Developing Country: A Retrospective, Registry-Based Study
- PMID: 35789431
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06645-3
Current Status and Outcomes of Critical Traumatic Brain Injury (GCS = 3-5) in a Developing Country: A Retrospective, Registry-Based Study
Abstract
Background: Patients sustaining critical TBI [initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 5] generally have poor outcomes. Little is known about the frequency, mortality rate, and functional outcomes of such patients in Iran.
Methods: In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, the demographic and clinicoradiological findings of TBI patients were queried from March 21, 2017, to March 21, 2020. We included TBI patients with initial GCS of 3-5. The functional outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score-extended 6 (GOSE-6) months after the hospital discharge. Patients were classified as having unfavorable (GOSE-6 ≤ 4) and favorable (GOSE-6 > 4) outcomes. Gathered data were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to find factors affecting the outcome.
Results: Four hundred ninety-seven patients (mean age = 37.59 ± 17.89) were enrolled, and 69.2% had unfavorable outcomes. Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) were highly overrepresented among the unfavorable group. 48.9% had bilateral fixed dilated pupils (BDFP), who mostly attained unfavorable outcomes. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 50.3%. The in-hospital mortality rate was appalling among elderly patients with BFDP and GCS 3( 90%) and GCS 4(100%). Age ≥ 65 years [odds ratio (OR) 3.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-10.04], and BFDP (OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.60-7.73) increase the odds of unfavorable outcomes according to the regression analysis.
Conclusion: The survival rate and favorable outcomes of critical TBI patients are generally poor. However, we believe that the neurotrauma surgeons should discuss with patients' proxies and explain the clinical conditions and possible outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
References
-
- Hong JH, Jeon I, Seo Y et al (2021) Radiographic predictors of clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir 163:1371–1381 - DOI
-
- Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S et al (2018) Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 130:1080–1097 - DOI
-
- McCrea MA, Giacino JT, Barber J et al (2021) Functional outcomes over the first year after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in the prospective, longitudinal TRACK-TBI study. JAMA Neurol 78:982–992 - DOI
-
- Dijkland SA, Foks KA, Polinder S et al (2020) Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of contemporary models and validation studies. J Neurotrauma 37:1–13 - DOI
-
- van Dijck JT, Reith FC, van Erp IA et al (2018) Decision making in very severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–5): a literature review of acute neurosurgical management. J Neurosurg Sci 62:153–177 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical