Impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outcome in multiple sclerosis
- PMID: 35791496
- PMCID: PMC9350380
- DOI: 10.1111/ene.15488
Impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outcome in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 continues to challenge neurologists in counselling persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and vaccination. The objective here was to characterize predictors of COVID-19 outcome in pwMS.
Methods: We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from a nationwide population-based registry. COVID-19 outcome was classified as either mild or severe. Impact of DMT, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and vaccination on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models adjusted for a-priori-risk (determined by a cumulative risk score comprising age, disability and comorbidities).
Results: Of 317 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 41.8 years [SD 12.4], 72.9% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range 0-8.5], 77% on DMT [16% on antiCD20]), 92.7% had a mild course and 7.3% a severe course with 2.2% dying from COVID-19. Ninety-seven pwMS (30.6%) were fully vaccinated. After a median 5 months from vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 1-9), severe COVID-19 occurred in 2.1% of fully vaccinated pwMS compared to 9.5% in unvaccinated pwMS (p=0.018). A-priori-risk robustly predicted COVID-19 severity (R2 0.605; p<0.001). Adjusting for a-priori-risk, anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; R2 0.113; p=0.003), but exposure to any other DMT was not. Fully vaccinated pwMS showed a significantly decreased risk for severe COVID-19 (OR 0.21, R2 0.144, p<0.001).
Conclusions: In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 course is primarily predicted by a-priori-risk (depending on age, disability and comorbidities) explaining about 60% of variance. Anti-CD20 treatment is associated with a moderately increased risk, while reassuringly vaccination provides protection from severe COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; Multiple sclerosis; SARS-CoV-2; disease-modifying treatment; severity; vaccination.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
G.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva, and has received honoraria for consulting from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. He has received research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis. C.G. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria (lectures, consultations) and/or travel funding from Biogen, D‐Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. H.H. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Siemens, and Teva, and has received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, and Teva. F.D.P. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Roche, and Teva. Her institution has received research grants from Roche. H.A. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria (advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Celgene/BMS, Janssen‐Cilag, and Teva. F.L. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. G.T. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. N.K. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Roche, Novartis, and Merck, and has held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. G.Z. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. P.R. has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Allmiral, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi‐Genzyme, and has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. P.W. has received funding for travel and honoraria (lectures, advisory boards) from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen‐Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. M.G. has received support and honoraria for research, consultation, lectures, and education from Almirall, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Aventis, and Teva Ratiopharm. C.E. has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Bayer, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Shire, Genzyme, and Teva; has received research support from Biogen, Merck, and Teva; and is serving on scientific advisory boards for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. T.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS, including Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, Celgene/BMS, GSK, Janssen‐Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months through unrestricted research grants (Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. Neither of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
