Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Sep;21(3):e213-e225.
doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Prognostic Role of Low-Skeletal Muscle Mass on Staging Computed Tomography in Metastasized Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hans-Jonas Meyer  1 , Alexandra Strobel  2 , Andreas Wienke  2 , Alexey Surov  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic Role of Low-Skeletal Muscle Mass on Staging Computed Tomography in Metastasized Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hans-Jonas Meyer et al. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Low-skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) is defined as skeletal muscle loss, which can be assessed by imaging. Our aim was to establish the effect of LSMM on overall survival (OS) in metastasized colorectal cancer patients based on a large patient sample.

Patients and methods: MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between LSMM and mortality in metastasized colorectal cancer patients up to March 2022. The primary aim of the systematic review was to investigate the influence of LSMM on overall survival (OS) by means of the effect of measure hazard ratio. Fifteen studies were included into the present analysis.

Results: The included studies comprised 1744 patients. The frequency of LSMM was 46.2%. Associations between LSMM and OS were as follows: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.91), P = .10 in univariable analysis and HR = 2.05 (95% CI 1.18-3.56), P = .01 in multivariable analysis. LSMM influenced OS in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy, HR = 1.51 (95% CI 1.20-1.89), P = .0004. In patients undergoing second- and third-line chemotherapy, LSMM was not associated with OS, HR = 1.43 (95% CI 0.65-3.14), P = .37 Also, LSMM did not affect OS in patients with resection of hepatic metastases, HR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.70-1.24), P = .63. LSMM tended to affect progression-free survival, HR = 1.49 (95% CI 0.94-2.35), P = .09. LSMM did not predict treatment toxicity, odds ratio (OR) = 1.52 (95% CI 0.84-2.72), P = .16.

Conclusion: LSMM occurs in 46.2% of patients with metastasized colorectal cancers. LSMM is associated with OS in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy. LSMM does not affect OS in second- and third-line chemotherapy and in patients undergoing resection of hepatic metastases. LSMM is not associated with progression-free survival and treatment toxicity.

Keywords: Body composition; CT; Colorectal Cancer; Metastasis; Sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms