Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 9;14(1):e1-e10.
doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3286.

Perspectives on sexual history taking in routine primary care consultations in North West, South Africa: Disconnect between patients and doctors

Deidré Pretorius  1 , Motlatso G Mlambo, Ian D Couper
Affiliations

Perspectives on sexual history taking in routine primary care consultations in North West, South Africa: Disconnect between patients and doctors

Deidré Pretorius et al. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sexual history is rarely taken in routine consultations and research reported on common barriers that doctors experience, such as gender, age and cultural differences. This article focuses on how patients and doctors view sexual history taking during a consultation and their perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of sexual history taking.

Aim: This study aimed to explore doctors' and patients' perspectives on sexual history taking during routine primary care consultations with patients at risk of sexual dysfunction.

Setting: The research was conducted in primary care facilities in the Dr Kenneth Kaunda Health District, North West province.

Methods: This was part of grounded theory research, involving 151 adult patients living with hypertension and diabetes and 21 doctors they consulted. Following recording of routine consultations, open-ended questions on the demographic questionnaire and brief interactions with patients and doctors were documented and analysed using open inductive coding. The code matrix and relations browsers in MaxQDA software were used.

Results: There was a disconnect between patients and doctors regarding their expectations on initiating the discussion on sexual challenges and relational and clinical priorities in the consultation. Patients wanted a doctor who listens. Doctors wanted patients to tell them about sexual dysfunction. Other minor barriers included gender, age and cultural differences and time constraints.

Conclusion: A disconnect between patients and doctors caused by the doctors' perceived clinical priorities and screening expectations inhibited sexual history taking in a routine consultation in primary care.

Keywords: barriers; communication; patient-centredness; patient–doctor engagement; receptiveness; sexual dysfunction; sexual history taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient factors influencing willingness to discuss sexual challenges.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Doctors’ responses on facilitators and barriers of sexual history taking.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Key findings on barriers to and facilitators of sexual history taking.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rider EA, Keefer CH. Communication skills competencies: Definitions and a teaching toolbox. Med Educ. 2006;40(7):624–629. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02500.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kingsberg S. Just ask! Talking to patients about sexual function. Sex Reprod Menopause. 2004;2(4):199–203. 10.1016/j.sram.2004.11.007 - DOI
    1. Bahrami_Vazir E, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Kamalifard M, et al. . The correlation between sexual dysfunction and intimate partner violence in young women during pregnancy. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020;8(2):149–177. 10.1186/s12914-020-00245-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boa R. Female sexual dysfunction. SAMJ. 2014;104(6):446. 10.7196/SAMJ.8373 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Domoney C. Sexual function in women: What is normal? Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(Suppl 1):9–17. 10.1007/s00192-009-0841-x.pdf - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources