Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;25(6):1609-1620.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01648-y. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

The use of an intermittent schedule of reinforcement to evaluate detection dogs' generalization from smokeless-powder

Affiliations

The use of an intermittent schedule of reinforcement to evaluate detection dogs' generalization from smokeless-powder

Edgar O Aviles-Rosa et al. Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Odor generalization is essential for detection dogs. Regardless of its importance, limited research is available on detection dog odor generalization. The objectives of this study were (1) evaluate the use of an intermittent schedule of reinforcement to assess generalization in dogs and (2) evaluate olfactory generalization from a single exemplar of smokeless powder (SP). Dogs (N = 5) were trained to detect SP in an automated olfactometer under an intermittent schedule of reinforcement where only 60% of correct responses were reinforced. After training, eight non-reinforced probe trials were inserted within a session. A total of 15 testing odors were evaluated across 15 consecutive sessions (one odor/session). Six of the testing odors were control and the remaining testing odors were objects indirectly exposed to SP, objects that contained or were directly exposed to SP, single-base SP and diphenylamine (the main volatile present in the headspace of SP). Dogs' response rate to all testing odors except for the cotton gauzes and t-shirt cloths exposed to the headspace of SP, the simulated IED, and Getxent tubes exposed to direct contact with SP were statistically lower than their response rate of actual SP. The response rate to SP was not different across all 15 testing sessions suggesting that the intermittent schedule of reinforcement, maintained dog motivation and performance. Data show that the outlined method is a good approach to study generalization in detection dogs. These results also highlight dog generalization to SP varieties and associated odors.

Keywords: Detection dog; Explosive generalization; Olfactory generalization; Reinforcement schedule.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aviles-Rosa EO, McGuinness G, Hall NJ (2021a) Case study: an evaluation of detection dog generalization to a large quantity of an unknown explosive in the field. Animals 11(5):1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051341 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Aviles-Rosa EO, Gallegos SF, Prada-Tiedemann PA, Hall NJ (2021b) An automated canine line-up for detection dog research. Front Veterinary Sci 8:775381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.775381 - DOI
    1. Cleland TA, Narla VA, Boudadi K (2009) Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization. Behav Neurosci 123(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013991 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Conover WJ (1999) Practical Nonparametric Statistics (Third). John Wiley & Sons Inc
    1. Cornu J-N, Cancel-Tassin G, Ondet V, Girardet C, Cussenot O (2011) Olfactory detection of prostate cancer by dogs sniffing urine: a step forward in early diagnosis. Eur Urol 59(2):197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.006 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources