Speech pathology prescribing in the outpatient setting: A review of requirements, considerations and barriers
- PMID: 35793383
- DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12756
Speech pathology prescribing in the outpatient setting: A review of requirements, considerations and barriers
Abstract
Background: As health systems face increasing demands, non-medical prescribing is a workforce redesign strategy adopted within some services. Despite successful implementation in other professional groups, non-medical prescribing within speech pathology (SP) has not yet been described.
Aims: To provide a descriptive account of the development and planned implementation of two SP prescribing models.
Methods & procedures: The evolution of two SP-led prescribing models, including relevant training and credentialing, for use of (1) nystatin oral drops (100,000 units/mL); and (2) lidocaine (lignocaine) and phenylephrine nasal spray (5 mg/500 μg/spray), in the outpatient setting is detailed. Challenges to implementation are outlined.
Main contribution: The development of relevant governance structures, a research evidenced-based project evaluation framework, and an overview of training pathways and credentialing was successfully completed. However, implementation of the models was unable to be achieved. A thorough review of the requirements and a discussion of contextual considerations that had a negative influence on the implementation of SP-led prescribing within this specific service context is provided.
Conclusions & implications: The successful implementation of SP-led prescribing is complex and highly context dependent. This work offers a discussion and review of the complexities of introducing a non-medical prescribing model in an outpatient hospital setting.
What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject Allied Health prescribing is an emerging practice area aiming to reduce current pressures on health services. SP-led prescribing has not been thoroughly investigated in the Australian context. What this study adds to existing knowledge This study describes the development of a SP-led prescribing process in the outpatient setting, and a thorough review and discussion of the drivers and barriers to the model's implementation. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The successful implementation of SP-led prescribing was identified to be complex from a legislative and operational perspective, as well as being highly context dependent. This study further highlights the importance of a thorough context evaluation and workflow mapping prior to full-scale implementation of SP prescribing trials.
Keywords: ear nose and throate (ENT); policy; practice; prescribing.
© 2022 Commonwealth of Australia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders © 2022 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adigwe, O.P. (2012) Non-medical prescribing in chronic non-malignant pain. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.
-
- Allied Health Professions Office of Queensland. (2014) A framework for allied health professional prescribing trials within Queensland Health [Online]. Available: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/158024/prescri... [Accessed 01/02/2017 2017].
-
- Armstrong, A. (2015) Staff and patient views on nurse prescribing in the urgent-care setting. Nurse Prescribing, 13, 614-619.
-
- Armstrong, A., Manfrin, A. & Gibson, J. (2021) Non-medical prescribing in primary care in the United Kingdom: an overview of the current literature. Journal of Prescribing Practice, 3, 352-361.
-
- Australian Government. (2000) National Medicines Policy. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/B2FFBF72....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous