Advantages and limitations of representing groups in terms of recursive utilities
- PMID: 35796353
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X21001394
Advantages and limitations of representing groups in terms of recursive utilities
Abstract
Group representations based on recursive utilities can be used to derive the same predictions as Pietraszewski in conflict situations. Additionally, these representations generalize to non-conflict situations, asymmetric relationships, and represent the stakes in a conflict. However, both proposals fail to represent asymmetries of power and responsibility and to account for generalizations from specific observed individuals to collections of non-observed individuals.
Comment in
-
More "us," less "them": An appeal for pluralism - and stand-alone computational theorizing - in our science of social groups.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 7;45:e127. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000024. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35796390
Comment on
-
Toward a computational theory of social groups: A finite set of cognitive primitives for representing any and all social groups in the context of conflict.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 27;45:e97. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000583. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33902764
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources