Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations
- PMID: 35796355
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X2100131X
Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations
Abstract
Pietraszewski misrepresents both the nature of behaviour in conflict and the ability of psychology to theorise the relational properties of group designation. At the behavioural level, he focusses exclusively on "attack," when consolation/care in conflict is equally present and important. At the theoretical level, he ignores existing psychological work on how group perception is shaped by the meta-contrast principle.
Comment in
-
More "us," less "them": An appeal for pluralism - and stand-alone computational theorizing - in our science of social groups.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 7;45:e127. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000024. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35796390
Comment on
-
Toward a computational theory of social groups: A finite set of cognitive primitives for representing any and all social groups in the context of conflict.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 27;45:e97. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000583. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33902764
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
