On vagueness and parochialism in psychological research on groups
- PMID: 35796362
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X21001369
On vagueness and parochialism in psychological research on groups
Abstract
Pietraszewski asserts that social psychological research on groups is too vague, tautological, and dependent on intuitions to be theoretically useful. We disagree. Pietraszewski's contribution is thought-provoking but also incomplete and guilty of many of the faults he attributes to others. Instead of rototilling the existing knowledge landscape, we urge for more integration of new and old ideas.
Comment in
-
More "us," less "them": An appeal for pluralism - and stand-alone computational theorizing - in our science of social groups.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 7;45:e127. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000024. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35796390
Comment on
-
Toward a computational theory of social groups: A finite set of cognitive primitives for representing any and all social groups in the context of conflict.Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 27;45:e97. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000583. Behav Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33902764
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources