Smartphone Ownership, Smartphone Utilization, and Interest in Using Mental Health Apps to Address Substance Use Disorders: Literature Review and Cross-sectional Survey Study Across Two Sites
- PMID: 35797102
- PMCID: PMC9305402
- DOI: 10.2196/38684
Smartphone Ownership, Smartphone Utilization, and Interest in Using Mental Health Apps to Address Substance Use Disorders: Literature Review and Cross-sectional Survey Study Across Two Sites
Abstract
Background: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in implementing digital technologies to diagnose, monitor, and intervene in substance use disorders. Smartphones are now a vehicle for facilitating telepsychiatry visits, measuring health metrics, and communicating with health care professionals. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the movement toward web-based and hybrid clinic visits and meetings, it has become especially salient to assess phone ownership among individuals with substance use disorders and their comfort in navigating phone functionality and using phones for mental health purposes.
Objective: The aims of this study were to summarize the current literature around smartphone ownership, smartphone utilization, and the acceptability of using smartphones for mental health purposes and assess these variables across two disparate substance use treatment sites.
Methods: We performed a focused literature review via a search of two academic databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) for publications since 2007 on the topics of smartphone ownership, smartphone utilization, and the acceptability of using mobile apps for mental health purposes among the substance use population. Additionally, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study that included 51 participants across two sites in New England-an inpatient detoxification unit that predominantly treats patients with alcohol use disorder and an outpatient methadone maintenance treatment clinic.
Results: Prior studies indicated that mobile phone ownership among the substance use population between 2013 and 2019 ranged from 83% to 94%, while smartphone ownership ranged from 57% to 94%. The results from our study across the two sites indicated 96% (49/51) mobile phone ownership and 92% (47/51) smartphone ownership among the substance use population. Although most (43/49, 88%) patients across both sites reported currently using apps on their phone, a minority (19/48, 40%) reported previously using any apps for mental health purposes. More than half of the participants reported feeling at least neutrally comfortable with a mental health app gathering information regarding appointment reminders (32/48, 67%), medication reminders (33/48, 69%), and symptom surveys (26/45, 58%). Most patients were concerned about privacy (34/51, 67%) and felt uncomfortable with an app gathering location (29/47, 62%) and social (27/47, 57%) information for health care purposes.
Conclusions: The majority of respondents reported owning a mobile phone (49/51, 96%) and smartphone (47/51, 92%), consistent with prior studies. Many respondents felt comfortable with mental health apps gathering most forms of personal information and with communicating with their clinician about their mental health. The differential results from the two sites, namely greater concerns about the cost of mental health apps among the methadone maintenance treatment cohort and less experience with downloading apps among the older inpatient detoxification cohort, may indicate that clinicians should tailor technological interventions based on local demographics and practice sites and that there is likely not a one-size-fits-all digital psychiatry solution.
Keywords: addiction; digital mental health; digital phenotyping; digital psychiatry; health equity; mHealth; mental health; mindfulness; mobile phone; phone applications; phone ownership; phone utilization; smartphone; substance abuse; substance use.
©Michael Hsu, Bianca Martin, Saeed Ahmed, John Torous, Joji Suzuki. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 07.07.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: MH is on the scientific advisory board of Healthy Gamer, LLC. JT is a cofounder of Precision Mental Wellness.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31344667 Free PMC article.
-
Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Health Technologies for Self-care Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Cross-sectional Survey Study.JMIR Cardio. 2022 Jan 14;6(1):e31982. doi: 10.2196/31982. JMIR Cardio. 2022. PMID: 35029533 Free PMC article.
-
Lack of ownership of mobile phones could hinder the rollout of mHealth interventions in Africa.Elife. 2022 Oct 18;11:e79615. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79615. Elife. 2022. PMID: 36255055 Free PMC article.
-
Smartphone application use patterns for mental health disorders: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Int J Med Inform. 2023 Nov;179:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105217. Epub 2023 Sep 21. Int J Med Inform. 2023. PMID: 37748330 Review.
-
Smartphone and Mobile App Use Among Physicians in Clinical Practice: Scoping Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 31;11:e44765. doi: 10.2196/44765. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 37000498 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Preference for hotline versus mobile application/countdown-based mobile overdose response services: a qualitative study.Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 5;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00944-9. Harm Reduct J. 2024. PMID: 38317194 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of a transtheoretical model based on health education intervention on adherence to methadone maintenance treatment: a quasi-experimental study.BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22067-x. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40038646 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Wastewater Samples to Explore Community Substance Use in the United States: Pilot Correlative and Machine Learning Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 26;7:e45353. doi: 10.2196/45353. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37883150 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability of "DIDE", a mobile application designed at facilitating care adherence of patients with substance use disorder.Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Oct 15;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00500-7. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 39407238 Free PMC article.
-
The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):156-174. doi: 10.1002/wps.21299. World Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40371757 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barnett I, Torous J, Staples P, Sandoval L, Keshavan M, Onnela JP. Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jul;43(8):1660–1666. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0030-z. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29511333 10.1038/s41386-018-0030-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- De Angel V, Lewis S, White K, Oetzmann C, Leightley D, Oprea E, Lavelle G, Matcham F, Pace A, Mohr DC, Dobson R, Hotopf M. Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods. NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00548-8. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00548-8.10.1038/s41746-021-00548-8 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hsu M, Ahern DK, Suzuki J. Digital phenotyping to enhance substance use treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Oct 26;7(10):e21814. doi: 10.2196/21814. https://mental.jmir.org/2020/10/e21814/ v7i10e21814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Maricich YA, Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Gatchalian K, Botbyl J, Luderer HF. Safety and efficacy of a prescription digital therapeutic as an adjunct to buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Feb;37(2):167–173. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1846022. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33140994 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources