Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12346.
doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12346.

The differences of the economic losses due to presenteeism and treatment costs between high-stress workers and non-high-stress workers using the stress check survey in Japan

Affiliations

The differences of the economic losses due to presenteeism and treatment costs between high-stress workers and non-high-stress workers using the stress check survey in Japan

Tomohisa Nagata et al. J Occup Health. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to examine differences in the economic losses due to presenteeism and costs of medical and dental treatment between high-stress workers and non-high-stress workers using the stress check survey.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019 in a pharmaceutical company. High-stress workers were classified with the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire using two methods: the sum method and the score converted method. The incidence of presenteeism and its costs were determined using a questionnaire. The costs of medical and dental treatment were calculated according to claims. We compared the costs between high-stress and non-high-stress workers using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test.

Results: Of 3910 workers, 6.3% were classified as high-stress using the sum method and 6.6% were classified as high-stress using the score converted method. The costs associated with presenteeism and medical treatment among high-stress workers were higher than the costs among non-high-stress workers, whereas the costs associated with dental treatment were not.

Conclusions: To motivate employers to improve stressful work environments, it is recommended that presenteeism measurement items be added to the stress check survey, and that the methods used in this study be used to calculate the loss associated with high-stress workers in Japanese companies. However, we must be careful in interpreting absolute presenteeism loss amounts because they are poorly reliable and valid.

Keywords: dental cost; high-stress; medical cost; presenteeism; stress check.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of this study
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The costs due to presenteeism, medical treatment and dental treatment per person per year (Japanese Yen) stratified by high‐stress workers or non‐high‐stress workers according to the sum method.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The costs due to presenteeism, medical treatment and dental treatment per person per year (Japanese Yen) stratified by high‐stress workers or non‐high‐stress workers according to the score converted method.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta‐analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:443‐462. - PubMed
    1. Lang J, Ochsmann E, Kraus T, Lang JWB. Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of stability‐adjusted longitudinal studies. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1163‐1174. - PubMed
    1. Nyberg ST, Fransson EI, Heikkilä K, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of 124,808 men and women. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2268‐2275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kivimäki M, Jokela M, Nyberg ST, et al. Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished data for 603,838 individuals. Lancet. 2015;386(10005):1739‐1746. - PubMed
    1. Leka S, Griffiths A, Cox T. Work Organization and Stress. Protecting Workers' Health Series No. 3. World Health Organization; 2004.