Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;6(10):1351-1361.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01396-6. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

Exposures and behavioural responses to wildfire smoke

Affiliations

Exposures and behavioural responses to wildfire smoke

Marshall Burke et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Pollution from wildfires constitutes a growing source of poor air quality globally. To protect health, governments largely rely on citizens to limit their own wildfire smoke exposures, but the effectiveness of this strategy is hard to observe. Using data from private pollution sensors, cell phones, social media posts and internet search activity, we find that during large wildfire smoke events, individuals in wealthy locations increasingly search for information about air quality and health protection, stay at home more and are unhappier. Residents of lower-income neighbourhoods exhibit similar patterns in searches for air quality information but not for health protection, spend less time at home and have more muted sentiment responses. During smoke events, indoor particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations often remain 3-4× above health-based guidelines and vary by 20× between neighbouring households. Our results suggest that policy reliance on self-protection to mitigate smoke health risks will have modest and unequal benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Human behaviour and wildfire smoke.
    Hervieux-Moore Z, Dominici F. Hervieux-Moore Z, et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;6(10):1327-1328. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01400-z. Nat Hum Behav. 2022. PMID: 35798883 No abstract available.

References

    1. Landrigan, P. J. et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 391, 462–512 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Carleton, T. A. & Hsiang, S. M. Social and economic impacts of climate. Science 353, aad9837 (2016). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Aizer, A., Currie, J., Simon, P. & Vivier, P. Do low levels of blood lead reduce children’s future test scores? Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 10, 307–41 (2018). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Deryugina, T., Miller, N., Molitor, D. & Reif, J. Geographic and socioeconomic heterogeneity in the benefits of reducing air pollution in the United States. Environ. Energy Policy Econ. 2, 157–189 (2021). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527, 235–239 (2015). - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources