Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 30;28(3):390-400.
doi: 10.5056/jnm21143.

General Well-being and Coping Strategies in Adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients

Affiliations

General Well-being and Coping Strategies in Adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients

Willemijn E de Rooij et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. .

Abstract

Background/aims: Growing evidence suggests a negative effect of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) on patients' general health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, the relevance and use of coping strategies and its relation to (disease specific) HRQOL as well as its determinants have not been studied well.

Methods: Adult EoE patients were invited to complete standardized measures on general HRQOL (Short Form-36 Health Survey [SF-36]) and coping strategies (Utrechtse Coping Lijst [UCL]). Scores were compared to general population norms. The disease specific Adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis Quality of Life (EoE-QOL-A) measure was used to assess EoE-HRQOL. Socio-demographic-and clinical factors were also evaluated.

Results: In total, 147 adult EoE patients (61% males), age 43 (interquartile range, 29-52) years were analyzed. Mental health-scores (SF-36) were significantly lower in EoE patients, whereas physical health-scores (SF-36) were similar in EoE patients (vs the general population; P = 0.010 and P = 0.240), respectively. The subdomain "disease anxiety" (EoE-QOL-A) was mostly affected, determinants were; female gender, younger age, severe clinical disease activity, higher number of food bolus extraction, and more recent EoE-diagnosis. Less effective coping styles (ie, passive/palliative reaction) were associated with a significant impact on each individual EoE-HRQOL-subdomain as well as lower scores of the Mental Health Component Scale in male EoE patients. Passive reaction in female EoE-patients correlated with impairment of the EoE-HRQOL-domains "emotional impact" and "disease anxiety." Active problem solving was significantly related to better perception of mental HRQOL (SF-36) in both males and females.

Conclusions: EoE has a significant negative impact on mental HRQOL, with less effective coping strategies--specifically in males, being a relevant determinant. Thus, a pro-active approach towards coping mechanisms is needed in order to enhance HRQOL and manage patients' burden of EoE.

Keywords: Adaptation; Eosinophilic esophagitis; Mental health; Quality of Life; psychological.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Albert J Bredenoord has received research funding from Nutricia, SST, Norgine, and Bayer; and speaker and/or consulting fees from Laborie, EsoCap, Medtronic, DrFalk, Calypso, Regeneron, Celgene, Norgine, and AstraZeneca. Willemijn E de Rooij, Aaltje Lei, and Floor Bennebroek Evertsz’ have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General health-related quality of life in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) compared to the Dutch general population (GP), stratified for gender. (A) Physical Health Component Scale (PCS; Short Form-36 Health Survey [SF-36]) of EoE patients compared to the Dutch GP. (B) Mental Health Component Scale (MCS; SF-36) of EoE patients compared to the Dutch GP. *P-value of < 0.05, indicating a significant outcome, **P-value of < 0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coping styles of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) compared to the Dutch general population (GP), stratified for gender. (A) EoE males vs GP males. (B) EoE females vs GP females. UCL, Utrechtse Coping Lijst. *P-value of < 0.05, indicating a significant outcome, **P-value of < 0.01, ***P-value of < 0.001.

References

    1. Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1342–1363. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:3–20. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.04.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, et al. Updated international consensus diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: proceedings of the AGREE conference. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1022–1033. e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Attwood SE, Smyrk TC, Demeester TR, Jones JB. Eosophageal eosinophilia with dysphagia. A distinct clincopathological syndrome. J Dig Dis. 1993;38:109–116. doi: 10.1007/BF01296781. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Straumann A, Spichtin HP, Bernoulli R, Loosli J, Vögtlin J. [Idiopathic eosinophilic esophagitis: a frequently overlooked disease with typical clinical aspects and discrete endoscopic findings.]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1994;124:1419–1429. [German] - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources