Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 May 15;44(3):174-180.

An Observational Retrospective Study of Adverse Events and Behavioral Outcomes During Pediatric Dental Sedation

Affiliations
Observational Study

An Observational Retrospective Study of Adverse Events and Behavioral Outcomes During Pediatric Dental Sedation

Kawtar Zouaidi et al. Pediatr Dent. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine a university-based dental electronic health records (EHR) database to identify sedation-related adverse events (AEs) and assess patients' behavioral outcomes during routine pediatric dental sedations (PDSs) in a dental school clinic. Methods: A database was screened for patients younger than 18 years old who had received dental sedation in 2019. The qualifying EHRs were then accessed and sedations were reviewed for AEs, which were categorized using a 12-point classification system and the Tracking and Reporting Outcomes of Procedural Sedation Tool. Patient behaviors were assessed using provider progress notes and categorized as presence/ absence of agitation. Results: A total of 690 sedations were reviewed, yielding 28 AEs. Emesis was the most common AE observed in 1.3 percent of sedations. Respiratory and cardiovascular AEs were observed in 0.7 percent and 0.6 percent of sedations, respectively. Agitation was identified in 47.5 percent of sedations, while 34.1 percent of agitations resulted in the documented suspension of dental treatment. Agitation was mainly observed for nitrous oxide and oral sedation resulting in one failed sedation out of five sedations for each method. Conclusions: Potentially serious adverse effects were identified during pediatric dental sedations, but their incidence was low. A significant proportion of the sedated children experienced agitation, resulting in some sedation failures. Such events need to be tracked and examined for risk assessment reduction and quality-of-care improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Wilson S. Pharmacological management of the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(2):131–6. - PubMed
    1. Lee H, Milgrom P, Huebner CE, et al. Ethics Rounds: Death After Pediatric Dental Anesthesia: An Avoidable Tragedy? Pediatrics 2017;140(6). - PubMed
    1. Yagiela JA. Making patients safe and comfortable for a lifetime of dentistry: frontiers in office-based sedation. J Dent Educ 2001;65(12):1348–56. - PubMed
    1. Wilson S, Houpt M. Project USAP 2010: Use of Sedative Agents in Pediatric Dentistry-a 25-year Follow-up Survey. Pediatr Dent 2016;38(2):127–33. - PubMed
    1. Spera AL, Saxen MA, Yepes JF, Jones JE, Sanders BJ. Office-Based Anesthesia: Safety and Outcomes in Pediatric Dental Patients. Anesth Prog;64(3):144–52. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources