Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 2;37(9):783-801.
doi: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2093130. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

The impact of age on the treatment of late-acquired sounds in children with speech sound disorders

Affiliations

The impact of age on the treatment of late-acquired sounds in children with speech sound disorders

Breanna I Krueger et al. Clin Linguist Phon. .

Abstract

The question of 'when' to treat speech sounds is often posed in the context of normative data. The new normative data suggest that speech sounds such as /ɹ/ and /l/ are acquired earlier than previously thought. The present study compared the treatment of late-acquired sounds between two age groups of English-speaking children: Young children (4-5) and Old children (7-8). Eight monolingual children with speech sound disorder (SSD) participated in the study. Each child received a criterion-based, standardised, two-phase therapy protocol. Treatment efficacy was measured by examining children's accuracy on real world speech probes. Treatment efficiency was measured by calculating the number of sessions required to meet the exit criterion and the mean session duration. For treatment efficacy, young children learned treated sounds as effectively as oldchildren did. For treatment efficiency, both groups required a comparable number of sessions, but young children required longer sessions than old children. The results suggest that delaying treatment of individual speech sounds is unnecessary and that a range of sounds should be considered as potential treatment targets.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03663972.

Keywords: Speech sound disorders; articulation; normative data; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement:

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial disclosures or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
PKP probe accuracy at baseline, phase shift, immediate posttest, and 2-week delayed posttest.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Mean number of minutes required for each subject for each phase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (n.d.) Speech Sound Disorders: Articulation and Phonology. (Practice Portal). Retrieved from www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Articulation-and-Phonology/.
    1. Baker E, Williams AL, McLeod S, & McCauley R (2018). Elements of phonological interventions for children with speech sound disorders: The development of a taxonomy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 906–935. 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0127 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brumbaugh KM, & Smit AB (2013). Treating children ages 3–6 who have speech sound disorder: a survey. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 44(3), 306–319. 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0029) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byun TM, & Hitchcock ER (2012). Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(3), 207–221. - PubMed
    1. Byun TM, Hitchcock ER, & Swartz MT (2014). Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2116–2130. 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources