Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e275-e283.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005521. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

Evaluating the Accuracy and Design of Visual Abstracts in Academic Surgical Journals

Keegan Guidolin  1   2   3 , Justin Lin  4 , Anudari Zorigtbaatar  5 , Minahil Nadeem  6 , Tarek Ibrahim  4 , Zdenka Neilson  7 , Kyung Young Peter Kim  4 , Luckshi Rajendran  1 , Sami Chadi  1   3 , Fayez Quereshy  1   3
Affiliations

Evaluating the Accuracy and Design of Visual Abstracts in Academic Surgical Journals

Keegan Guidolin et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the quality and accuracy of visual abstracts published in academic surgical journals.

Background: Visual abstracts are commonly used to disseminate medical research findings. They distill the key messages of a research article, presenting them graphically in an engaging manner so that potential readers can decide whether to read the complete manuscript.

Methods: We developed the Visual Abstract Assessment Tool based upon published guidelines. Seven reviewers underwent iterative training to apply the tool. We collected visual abstracts published by 25 surgical journals from January 2017 to April 2021; those corresponding to systematic reviews without meta-analysis, conference abstracts, narrative reviews, video abstracts, or nonclinical research were excluded. Included visual abstracts were scored on accuracy (as compared with written abstracts) and design, and were given a "first impression" score.

Results: Across 25 surgical journals 1325 visual abstracts were scored. We found accuracy deficits in the reporting of study design (35.8%), appropriate icon use (49%), and sample size reporting (69.2%), and design deficits in element alignment (54.8%) and symmetry (36.1%). Overall scores ranged from 9 to 14 (out of 15), accuracy scores from 4 to 8 (out of 8), and design scores from 3 to 7 (out of 7). No predictors of visual abstract score were identified.

Conclusion: Visual abstracts vary widely in quality. As visual abstracts become integrated with the traditional components of scientific publication, they must be held to similarly high standards. We propose a checklist to be used by authors and journals to standardize the quality of visual abstracts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Johnson M, Watkinson A, Mabe M. T he STM Report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. 2018. Available at: https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf . Accessed June 20, 2022.
    1. Ibrahim A. Surgery redesign. Available at: https://www.surgeryredesign.com/ Accessed June 20, 2022.
    1. Ibrahim A. Visual abstract primer. 2018. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5854aaa044024321a353bb0d/t/5a527a... . Accessed June 20, 2022.
    1. Brook OR, Vernuccio F, Nicola R, et al. Visual abstract for Abdominal Radiology: what it is, why we need it and how to make it. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:2403–2406.
    1. Ibrahim AM, Bradley SM. Adoption of visual abstracts at circulation CQO: why and how we’re doing it. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003684.