Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29324.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029324.

Semi-occlusive management of fingertip injuries with finger caps: A randomized controlled trial in children and adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Semi-occlusive management of fingertip injuries with finger caps: A randomized controlled trial in children and adults

Jurek Schultz et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: Human fingertips can regenerate functionally and cosmetically excellent skin and soft tissues. Physiological conditions suppress scar formation and are thus a prerequisite for regenerative healing. Self-adhesive film dressings can provide such favorable conditions. The semi-occlusive treatment is superior to surgery. However, standard dressings leak malodorous wound fluid eventually until the wound is dry. Therefore, we developed and tested a silicone finger cap that forms a mechanically protected, wet chamber around the injury. Its puncturable reservoir allows access to the wound fluid for diagnostic and research purposes and the delivery of pro-regenerative drugs in the future.

Methods: Patients >2 years with full-thickness fingertip injuries unsuitable for simple primary closure were randomized to start treatment with either the film dressing or the silicone finger cap. After 2 weeks, we changed to the other treatment. Patients' choice on the preferred treatment after 4 weeks was the primary outcome parameter. Additionally, we monitored adverse events, unplanned visits, tissue gain, functionality, cosmetic outcome, and quality of life.

Results: We randomized 11 patients 2 to 72 years to each group. Eighteen to 20 (90%, intention-to-treat) patients preferred the finger cap. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome, 88.9% had no disturbing sensibility changes, and 73.7% could report no distortion in the finger's daily use. Epithelialization took between 5 weeks for Allen II and up to 9 weeks in Allen IV injuries. There were 19 device-related adverse events under film dressing and 13 under the finger cap. There were neither severe adverse device effects nor unexpected severe adverse device effects.

Conclusion: Employing the summative or synthetic primary endpoint "patient decision for one or the other procedure," our pseudocross-over-designed RCT succeeded in statistically significantly demonstrating the superiority of the silicone finger cap over conventional film therapy. The finger cap was safe and effective, reaching excellent results on all treated injuries without any need for disinfection, antibiotics, shortening of protruding bones, or treatment of hypergranulations. Distal to the tendon insertions, we did not see any limitations regarding injury mechanism, amputation plane, or patients' age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The TU-Dresden, Dr Jurek Schultz, and Prof Guido Fitze have filed a patent for the silicone finger cap (PCT/DE2014/100088; 14721743.4-1308; 14/774,997). Besides, the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this study protocol. Randomization, monitoring, evaluation of study data, statistics and sponsor office are committed to the KKS Dresden, an institute independent of the Department of Pediatric Surgery.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Photographs and radiographs/sonographies at the day of the injury (V1), at 2 wks (V4), at 4 wks (V7), and after more than 4 mo (follow-up). (A) Allen IV-injury, (B) Allen I-injury.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conn JM, Annest JL, Ryan GW, et al. . Non-work-related finger amputations in the United States, 2001-2002. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:630–5. - PubMed
    1. Macgregor DM, Hiscox JA. Fingertip trauma in children from doors. Scott Med J. 1999;44:114–5. - PubMed
    1. Ljungberg E, Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. Hand injuries in young children. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28 B(4):376–380. - PubMed
    1. Muneuchi G, Tamai M, Igawa K, et al. . The PNB classification for treatment of fingertip injuries: the boundary between conservative treatment and surgical treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:604–9. - PubMed
    1. Illingworth CM. Trapped fingers and amputated finger tips in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1974;9:853–58. - PubMed

Publication types