Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 18;56(12):1284-1299.
doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac024.

Continuous-Time Modeling of the Bidirectional Relationship Between Incidental Affect and Physical Activity

Affiliations

Continuous-Time Modeling of the Bidirectional Relationship Between Incidental Affect and Physical Activity

Geralyn R Ruissen et al. Ann Behav Med. .

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests that there is a bidirectional relationship between incidental affect (i.e., how people feel in day-to-day life) and physical activity behavior. However, many inconsistencies exist in the body of work due to the lag interval between affect and physical activity measurements.

Purpose: Using a novel continuous-time analysis paradigm, we examined the temporal specificity underlying the dynamic relationship between positive and negative incidental affective states and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Methods: A community sample of adults (n = 126, Mage = 27.71, 51.6% Male) completed a 14-day ambulatory assessment protocol measuring momentary positive and negative incidental affect six times a day while wearing a physical activity monitor (Fitbit). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous-time structural equation modeling was used to elucidate the underlying dynamics of the relationship between incidental affective states and MVPA.

Results: Based on the continuous-time cross-effects, positive and negative incidental affect predicted subsequent MVPA. Furthermore, engaging in MVPA predicted subsequent positive and negative incidental affect. Incidental affective states had a greater relative influence on predicting subsequent MVPA compared to the reciprocal relationship. Analysis of the discrete-time coefficients suggests that cross-lagged effects increase as the time interval between measurements increase, peaking at about 8 h between measurement occasions before beginning to dissipate.

Conclusions: The results provide support for a recursive relationship between incidental affective states and MVPA, which is particularly strong at 7-9 hr time intervals. Future research designs should consider these medium-term dynamics, for both theory development and intervention.

Keywords: Continuous-time; Dynamic; Incidental affect; Physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Posterior mean and 95% credibility intervals for the standardized discrete-time autoregressive effects (i.e., persistence of MVPA (indicated by the solid, red line) and positive incidental affect (PA; indicated by the dot-dashed, purple line) and the cross-lagged effects (i.e., association between MVPA and positive affect at the subsequent time point (indicated by the long-dashed, blue line), and between positive incidental affect and MVPA at the subsequent time point (indicated by the short-dashed, green line)) at time interval lengths up to 48 hours. Please see the online version for the color version of the figure.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Posterior mean and 95% credibility intervals for the standardized discrete-time autoregressive effects (i.e., persistence of MVPA (indicated by the solid, red line) and negative incidental affect (NA; indicated by the dot-dashed, purple line) and the cross-lagged effects (i.e., association between MVPA and negative affect at the subsequent time point (indicated by the long-dashed, blue line), and between negative affect and MVPA at the subsequent time point (indicated by the short-dashed, green line)) at time interval lengths up to 48 hours. Please see online version for the color version of the figure.

References

    1. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine—Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl. 3):1–72. doi:10.1111/sms.12581. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rebar AL, Stanton R, Geard D, Short CE, Duncan MJ, Vandelanotte C. A meta-meta-analysis of the effect of physical activity on depression and anxiety in non-clinical adult populations. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):366–378. doi:10.1080/17437199.2015.1022901. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhodes RE, Janssen I, Bredin SSD, Warburton DER, Bauman AE. Physical activity: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health. 2017;32(8):942–975. doi:10.1080/08870446.2017.1325486. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin SB, Morrow JR, Jackson AW, Dunn AL. Variables related to meeting the CDC/ACSM physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(12):2087–2092. doi:10.1097/00005768-200012000-00019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–e1086. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types