Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270483.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270483. eCollection 2022.

Sedation in specialized palliative care: A cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Sedation in specialized palliative care: A cross-sectional study

Christel Hedman et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Palliative sedation is used to relieve refractory symptoms and is part of clinical practice in Sweden. Yet we do not know how frequently this practice occurs, how decision-making takes place, or even which medications are preferentially used.

Objectives: To understand the current practice of palliative sedation in Sweden.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional medical record-based study. For 690 consecutive deceased patients from 11 of 12 specialized palliative care units in the southernmost region of Sweden who underwent palliative sedation during 2016, we collected data on whether the patient died during sedation and, for sedated patients, the decision-making process, medication used, and depth of sedation.

Results: Eight percent of patients were sedated. Almost all (94%) were given midazolam, sometimes in combination with propofol. The proportions of sedation were similar in the patient groups with and without cancer. The largest proportion of the sedated patients died in inpatient care, but 23% died at home, with specialized palliative home care. Among the patients with a decision to sedate, 42% died deeply unconscious, while for those without such a decision the corresponding figure was 16%. In only one case was there more than one physician involved in the decision to use palliative sedation.

Conclusion: 8% of patients in specialized palliative care received palliative sedation, which is lower than international measures but much increased compared to an earlier Swedish assessment. The level of consciousness achieved often did not correspond to the planned level; this, together with indications of a scattered decision process, shows a need for clear guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests

References

    1. Cherny NI, Radbruch L, Board of the European Association for Palliative C. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliative medicine. 2009;23(7):581–93. doi: 10.1177/0269216309107024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beller EM, van Driel ML, McGregor L, Truong S, Mitchell G. Palliative pharmacological sedation for terminally ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010206.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maltoni M, Miccinesi G, Morino P, Scarpi E, Bulli F, Martini F, et al. Prospective observational Italian study on palliative sedation in two hospice settings: differences in casemixes and clinical care. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2012;20(11):2829–36. - PubMed
    1. Abarshi E, Rietjens J, Robijn L, Caraceni A, Payne S, Deliens L, et al. International variations in clinical practice guidelines for palliative sedation: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7(3):223–9. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001159 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hasselaar J. Palliative sedation—The use of proportional palliative sedation for the relief of refractory symptoms https://palliativesedation.eu (accessed 1 March 2022).