Oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic colectomy in patients with transverse colon cancer
- PMID: 35804251
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02650-9
Oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic colectomy in patients with transverse colon cancer
Abstract
Background: Literature concerning surgical management of transverse colon cancer is scarce, since many key trials excluded transverse colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and oncological outcomes comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic transverse colon cancer resection.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for transverse colon cancer between December 2005 and July 2021 were included. Data were kept in a prospective database approved by the institutional ethics committee. Primary outcome was overall and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included complications, operative time, length of stay and lymph node harvest. Statistical analysis was corrected for age and tumour localisation.
Results: Two hundred and forty-six (38 robotic, 71 open and 137 laparoscopic resections) were recruited in this study. There were five conversions during laparoscopic procedures. Operative time was significantly shorter in robotic vs laparoscopic procedures (195 vs 238 min, p = 0.005) and length of stay was shorter in robotic vs laparoscopic and open group (7 vs 9 vs 15 days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall complications. R0 resections were similar. Lymph node harvest was highest in the robotic group vs. laparoscopic or open (32 vs. 29 vs. 21, p < 0.001). Overall survival was 97%, 85% and 60% (p < 0.001) and disease-free survival was 91%, 78% and 56% (p < 0.001) for the robotic, laparoscopic and open groups, respectively.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery for transverse colon cancer is safe and offers good clinical and oncological outcomes. Robotic resection is associated with significantly shorter operating times, higher lymph node harvest, lower conversion rate and does not increase morbidity. Differences in disease-free and overall survival should be further explored in randomised controlled trials.
Keywords: Colorectal robotic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Surgical oncology; Surgical technique; Transverse colon cancer.
© 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr 2;40(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04859-0. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40172685 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer can be performed with a morbidity profile similar to that of conventional laparoscopic colectomy.Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02249-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Tech Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32495252
-
Initial experience of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a matched case-control study.World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct 9;13:295. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0708-1. World J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26452727 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Transverse Colon Cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct;19(10):1869-74. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2891-3. Epub 2015 Jul 22. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015. PMID: 26197767
-
Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review.Colorectal Dis. 2020 May;22(5):488-499. doi: 10.1111/codi.14822. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Colorectal Dis. 2020. PMID: 31400185
Cited by
-
[Transition phase to robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a comparative consecutive cohort study].Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02316-w. Online ahead of print. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025. PMID: 40471312 German.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes-A Focus on Studies from 2020-2024.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1552. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081552. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr 2;40(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04859-0. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40172685 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brody H (2015) Colorectal cancer. Nature 521(7551):S1 - DOI
-
- Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, et al. Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. (2468–1253 (Electronic)).
-
- Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229 - DOI
-
- Boutros M, Hippalgaonkar N, Silva E, Allende D, Wexner SD, Berho M (2013) Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):679–688 - DOI
-
- Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248(5):728–738 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources