Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 24;12(13):1622.
doi: 10.3390/ani12131622.

The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates

Affiliations

The Impact of COVID-19 Zoo Closures on Behavioural and Physiological Parameters of Welfare in Primates

Ellen Williams et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Primates are some of the most cognitively advanced species held in zoos, and their interactions with visitors are complex. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to understand the impact of zoo visitors on animals, in comparison to "empty zoos". This study sought to understand the impact of facility closures and subsequent reopenings on behavioural and physiological parameters of welfare in four primate species housed in the UK: bonobos (Pan paniscus) (n = 8), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (n = 11), and western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) (n = 6) held at Twycross Zoo (TZ); and olive baboons (Papio anubis) (n = 192) held at Knowsley Safari (KS). Behavioural data were collected from April-September 2020 (KS) and November 2020-January 2021 (TZ). Faecal samples were collected during morning checks from October-November (TZ) and July-November 2020 (KS). Faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) were measured using ELISA kits. Statistical analysis for behavioural observations was undertaken using general linear models. Enclosure usage was assessed using t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests as appropriate. Bonobos and gorillas spent less time alone when facilities were open to the public (p = 0.004, p = 0.02 respectively). Gorillas spent less time resting when the facility was open to the public (p = 0.04), and chimpanzees engaged in more feeding (p = 0.02) and engagement with enrichment (p = 0.03) when the zoo was open to the public than when it was closed. Olive baboons performed less sexual and dominance behaviour and approached visitor cars more frequently when the safari park was opened to the public than they did the ranger's vehicle during closure periods. There were no significant changes in physiological parameters for any of the study species. The results suggest variable impacts of the zoo closures on zoo-housed primates. We recommend future work that seeks to understand the impact of individual-level differences on "visitor effects" and that differences between animal experiences in zoos and safari parks are further explored in a range of species.

Keywords: behaviour; primates; visitor effect; welfare; zoo/safari park.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of mean frequency of bonobo behaviour during closure and reopening observation periods. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average number of bonobos per enclosure zone per observation period. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
An overview of mean frequency of chimpanzee behaviour during closure and reopening observation periods. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average number of chimpanzees per enclosure zone per observation period. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
An overview of mean frequency of gorilla behaviour during closure and reopening observation periods. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average number of gorillas per enclosure zone per observation period. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
An overview of mean frequency of olive baboon behaviour during closure and reopening observation periods. To account for variation in sample group sizes, data represents an average behaviour frequency per smallest group size (group size 1). Error bars represent standard deviation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ward S.J., Sherwen S., Clark F.E. Advances in Applied Zoo Animal Welfare Science. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2018;21:23–33. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1513842. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melfi V. There Are Big Gaps in Our Knowledge, and Thus Approach, to Zoo Animal Welfare: A Case for Evidence-based Zoo Animal Management. Zoo Biol. 2009;28:574–588. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20288. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maple T.L., Bloomsmith M.A. Introduction: The Science and Practice of Optimal Animal Welfare. Behav. Process. 2018;156:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaglio S., Kaburu S., Pearce R., Bryant L., McAuley A., Lott A., Sheppard D., Smith S., Tompkins B., Elwell E. Effects of Scent Enrichment on Behavioural and Physiological Indicators of Stress in Zoo Primates. Am. J. Primatol. 2021;83:e23247. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spiezio C., Piva F., Regaiolli B., Vaglio S. Positive Reinforcement Training: A Tool for Care and Management of Captive Vervet Monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) Anim. Welf. 2016;24:283–290. doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.283. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources