Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 24;12(13):1628.
doi: 10.3390/ani12131628.

Evaluation of Two Equations for Prediction of Digestible Energy in Mixed Feeds and Diets for Horses

Affiliations

Evaluation of Two Equations for Prediction of Digestible Energy in Mixed Feeds and Diets for Horses

Andrés Luis Martínez Marín et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Several authors have developed equations for estimating digestible energy in horse feeds as an alternative to the inconveniences of in vivo digestibility assays. We aimed to evaluate two of such equations. A dataset was constructed from the literature with 32 mixed feeds and diets of known proximate composition, whose digestibility was measured in in vivo assays. Then, the digestible energy of the mixed feeds and diets was predicted with both equations from their proximate components. Precision, accuracy, reproducibility, bias, and decomposition of total error of predictions were determined. Both equations performed almost equally well (R2 = 0.89 vs. 0.87, root mean square error of prediction = 183 vs. 217 kcal/kg dry matter, concordance correlation coefficient = 0.91 vs. 0.86, and linear error = 24.6 vs. 33.6% of total error). Linear bias (p < 0.01 in both equations) resulted in overvaluation of low digestible energy feeds and, to a lesser extent, undervaluation of high digestible energy feeds and was significantly (p < 0.05) related to crude fiber. The obtained results indicate that the accuracy of both equations could be improved by reassessing the effects of crude fiber on the digestibility of the other proximate components.

Keywords: digestibility; energy; equine; feeding; nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plot of predicted versus measured values of digestible energy. Equation 1: Equation of Núñez-Sánchez et al. [8]. Equation 2: Equation of Zeyner and Kienzle [14] modified as presented in Kienzle and Zeyner [4].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plot of residuals versus predicted digestible energy centered in the predicted mean. Equation 1: Equation of Núñez-Sánchez et al. [8]. Equation 2: Equation of Zeyner and Kienzle [14] modified as presented in Kienzle and Zeyner [4].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plot of residuals versus crude fiber content in feeds. Equation 1: Equation of Núñez-Sánchez et al. [8]. Equation 2: Equation of Zeyner and Kienzle [14] modified, as presented in Kienzle and Zeyner [4].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bergero D., Valle E. A multi-factorial approach to the nutritional requirements of sports horses: Critical analysis and some practical applications. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2007;6:639–641. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.639. - DOI
    1. Becvarova I., Pleasant R.S., Thatcher C.D. Clinical assessment of nutritional status and feeding programs in horses. Veter Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2009;25:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Research Council (NRC) Nutritional Energetics of Domestic Animals and Glossary of Energy Terms. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1981.
    1. Kienzle E., Zeyner A. The development of a metabolizable energy system for horses. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2010;94:e231–e240. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01015.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vermorel M., Martin-Rosset W. Concepts, scientific bases, structure and validation of the French horse net energy system (UFC) Livest. Prod. Sci. 1997;47:261–275. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01410-8. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources