Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 26;14(13):3126.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14133126.

Perspectives for 3D-Bioprinting in Modeling of Tumor Immune Evasion

Affiliations
Review

Perspectives for 3D-Bioprinting in Modeling of Tumor Immune Evasion

Rafał Staros et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

In a living organism, cancer cells function in a specific microenvironment, where they exchange numerous physical and biochemical cues with other cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). Immune evasion is a clinically relevant phenomenon, in which cancer cells are able to direct this interchange of signals against the immune effector cells and to generate an immunosuppressive environment favoring their own survival. A proper understanding of this phenomenon is substantial for generating more successful anticancer therapies. However, classical cell culture systems are unable to sufficiently recapture the dynamic nature and complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) to be of satisfactory use for comprehensive studies on mechanisms of tumor immune evasion. In turn, 3D-bioprinting is a rapidly evolving manufacture technique, in which it is possible to generate finely detailed structures comprised of multiple cell types and biomaterials serving as ECM-analogues. In this review, we focus on currently used 3D-bioprinting techniques, their applications in the TME research, and potential uses of 3D-bioprinting in modeling of tumor immune evasion and response to immunotherapies.

Keywords: CAR-T; anticancer immunotherapies; checkpoint inhibitors; immune response; in vitro modelling; tumor architecture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of factors within tumor microenvironment that inhibit anticancer immune response (please see text for details).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical presentation of principles of four types of 3D-bioprinting techniques.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative micrographs of 3D-bioprinted co-culture cancer models involving (A) extrusion-based method (visible light microscopy) or (B) a droplet-based technique in visible light microscopy (upper panel) or fluorescent microscopy (bottom panel)—a mix of PKH67-labeled MSC (green signal) and PKH26-labeled HCT116 colon cancer cells (red signal) was suspended in bioink and co-bioprinted using a BioX bioprinter (CELLINK, Sweden). Courtesy of Ms. Anna Słysz (Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland).

References

    1. Khalaf K., Hana D., Chou J.T., Singh C., Mackiewicz A., Kaczmarek M. Aspects of the Tumor Microenvironment Involved in Immune Resistance and Drug Resistance. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:656364. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.656364. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morton J.J., Bird G., Refaeli Y., Jimeno A. Humanized Mouse Xenograft Models: Narrowing the Tumor-Microenvironment Gap. Cancer Res. 2016;76:6153–6158. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doig K.D., Fellowes A., Scott P., Fox S.B. Tumour mutational burden: An overview for pathologists. Pathology. 2022;54:249–253. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.11.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources