Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 30;14(13):3204.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14133204.

Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial

Affiliations
Review

Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial

Paolo Goffredo et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Over the past decade, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has progressively become more complex. The introduction of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has increased the rates of both clinical and pathological complete response, resulting in excellent long-term oncological outcomes. As a result, non-operative management (NOM) of LARC patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has gained acceptance as a potential treatment option in selected cases. NOM is based on replacement of surgical resection with safe and active surveillance. However, the identification of appropriate candidates for a NOM strategy without compromising oncologic safety is currently challenging due to the lack of an objective standardization. NOM should be part of the treatment plan discussion with LARC patients, considering the increasing rates of cCR, patient preference, quality of life, expectations, and the potential avoidance of surgical morbidity. The recently published OPRA trial showed that organ preservation is achievable in half of rectal cancer patients treated with TNT, and that chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy may an appropriate strategy to maximize cCR rates. Ongoing trials are investigating optimal algorithms of TNT delivery to further expand the pool of patients who may benefit from NOM of LARC.

Keywords: chemoradiation; neoadjuvant therapy; nonoperative management; rectal cancer; total neoadjuvant therapy; watch and wait.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Memorial Sloan Kettering three-tiered response/regression schema.

References

    1. NCCN NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Rectal Cancer. [(accessed on 12 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf2021.
    1. Smith J.J., Chow O.S., Gollub M.J., Nash G.M., Temple L.K., Weiser M.R., Guillem J.G., Paty P.B., Avila K., Garcia-Aguilar J. Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:767. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1632-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maas M., Nelemans P.J., Valentini V., Das P., Rödel C., Kuo L.J., Calvo F.A., García-Aguilar J., Glynne-Jones R., Haustermans K., et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:835–844. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Aguilar J., Chow O.S., Smith D.D., Marcet J.E., Cataldo P.A., Varma M.G., Kumar A.S., Oommen S., Coutsoftides T., Hunt S.R., et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:957–966. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00004-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ho V.P., Lee Y., Stein S.L., Temple L.K. Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: A review. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2011;54:113–125. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb7b82. - DOI - PubMed