Could We Predict the Response of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
- PMID: 35804984
- PMCID: PMC9264773
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133213
Could We Predict the Response of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
Abstract
The use of anti-programmed cell-death protein (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) is an important strategy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the treatment only benefits 10-20% of patients when used as a monotherapy. Therefore, the selection of patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment is crucial for both patients and clinicians. This review aimed to explore the existing literature on tissue or circulating markers for the identification of responders or non-responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in HCC. For the clinically available markers, both etiological factors (viral versus non-viral) and disease extent (intra-hepatic vs. extrahepatic) impact the responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1, warranting further studies. Preliminary data suggested that inflammatory indices (e.g., neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio) may be associated with clinical outcomes of HCC during the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Finally, although PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues is a predictive marker for multiple cancer types, its clinical application is less clear in HCC due to the lack of a clear-cut association with responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Although all translational markers are not routinely measured in HCC, recent data suggest their potential roles in selecting patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Such markers, including the immune classification of HCC, selected signaling pathways, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and auto-antibodies, were discussed in this review.
Keywords: anti-programmed cell-death protein (ligand)-1; clinical biomarker; hepatocellular carcinoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor; predictive biomarker; translational biomarker.
Conflict of interest statement
Hong Jae Chon has been a consultant/advisor to Roche, ONO, BMS, Eisai, Bayer, MSD, and AstraZeneca, received research grants from Roche, and received lecture fees from Roche, Bayer, and BMS. Stephen L. Chan has been an advisor to Astrazeneca, Autem, Eisai, Ipsen, MSD, and Novartis, received a research grant from Bayer, Ipsen, and SIRTEX, and received a lecture fee from Astrazeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Roche, and MSD. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials