Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 24;23(13):7031.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23137031.

Plant Responses to Herbivory, Wounding, and Infection

Affiliations
Review

Plant Responses to Herbivory, Wounding, and Infection

Salma Mostafa et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Plants have various self-defense mechanisms against biotic attacks, involving both physical and chemical barriers. Physical barriers include spines, trichomes, and cuticle layers, whereas chemical barriers include secondary metabolites (SMs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Complex interactions between plants and herbivores occur. Plant responses to insect herbivory begin with the perception of physical stimuli, chemical compounds (orally secreted by insects and herbivore-induced VOCs) during feeding. Plant cell membranes then generate ion fluxes that create differences in plasma membrane potential (Vm), which provokes the initiation of signal transduction, the activation of various hormones (e.g., jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and ethylene), and the release of VOCs and SMs. This review of recent studies of plant-herbivore-infection interactions focuses on early and late plant responses, including physical barriers, signal transduction, SM production as well as epigenetic regulation, and phytohormone responses.

Keywords: airborne signaling; epigenetic regulation; intracellular signaling; physical barrier; plant–herbivore interaction; secondary metabolite; signal transduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of plant physical barriers against herbivory attack, including wax cuticle layers, trichomes, thorns, and hairs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the calcium signaling pathway following biotic attack. After an attack, resistance elicitors are released in herbivore oral secretions (OS), precipitated, and bound to receptors, causing a rapid increase in calcium cytosolic ([Ca2+] cyt) content. Calcium channels and ATP-dependent Ca2+ pumps in the cell membrane and cell organelles (e.g., mitochondria, vacuoles, and endoplasmic reticulum) organize Ca2+ ions inside and outside the cell/organelles. Greater increases in Ca2+ ions trigger potassium (K+) channel activation, causing plasma membrane potential (Vm) depolarization. Different calcium receptors (e.g., CBL–CIPK, calcineurin B-like protein- CBL interacting protein kinase, CML42/CML43, calmodulin-like proteins 42/43, and CPK3/CPK13, calcium-dependent protein kinases3/13) increase to activate transcription factors, such as HSFB2A. Finally, transcriptional regulation in the nucleus induces plant herbivore defense (Modified from [5]).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the interactions among reactive oxygen species (ROS), Ca2+, and phytohormones (JA, jasmonic acid, SA, salicylic acid, and ethylene) within the cell upon biotic attack. Ca2+ influxes activate ethylene and calmodulins (CaMs) of JAV1, dismantling the JAV1–JAZ8–WRKY51 (JJW) complex to activate JA biosynthesis and thereby producing jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile). High JA concentrations cause ROS accumulation, which in turn induces SA and vice versa. Distal transfer of Ca2+ (through glutamate receptor-like (GLR) channels), JA, and JA-Ile occurs between cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The main plant secondary metabolites (SMs) involved in plant defenses against herbivores, broadly classified as phenolics, terpenes, and sulfur (S)- and nitrogen (N)-containing compounds.

References

    1. Belete T. Defense mechanisms of plants to insect pests: From morphological to biochemical approach. Trends Tech. Sci. Res. 2018;2:555584. doi: 10.19080/TTSR.2018.02.555584. - DOI
    1. Kloth K.J., Abreu I.N., Delhomme N., Petrík I., Villard C., Ström C., Amini F., Novák O., Moritz T., Albrectsen B.R. PECTIN AceTyLeSTerase9 affects the transcriptome and metabolome and delays aphid feeding. Plant Physiol. 2019;181:1704–1720. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00635. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun T., Zhang Y. Short- and long-distance signaling in plant defense. Plant J. 2021;105:505–517. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spoel S., Dong X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012;12:89–100. doi: 10.1038/nri3141. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zebelo S.A., Maffei M.E. Role of early signalling events in plant-insect interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2015;66:435–448. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru480. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources