Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 30;23(13):7261.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23137261.

Glycaemic Control in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Is the Role for the Novel Antidiabetic Agents? A Comprehensive Review of Basic Science and Clinical Data

Affiliations
Review

Glycaemic Control in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Is the Role for the Novel Antidiabetic Agents? A Comprehensive Review of Basic Science and Clinical Data

Annunziata Nusca et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and revascularization through percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) significantly improves survival. In this setting, poor glycaemic control, regardless of diabetes, has been associated with increased incidence of peri-procedural and long-term complications and worse prognosis. Novel antidiabetic agents have represented a paradigm shift in managing patients with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. However, limited data are reported so far in patients undergoing coronary stenting. This review intends to provide an overview of the biological mechanisms underlying hyperglycaemia-induced vascular damage and the contrasting actions of new antidiabetic drugs. We summarize existing evidence on the effects of these drugs in the setting of PCI, addressing pre-clinical and clinical studies and drug-drug interactions with antiplatelet agents, thus highlighting new opportunities for optimal long-term management of these patients.

Keywords: anti-diabetic agents; coronary artery disease; coronary stenting; diabetes mellitus; glycaemic control; glycaemic variability; hyperglycaemia; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathophysiological mechanisms of hyperglycaemia-induced vascular damage. AGE, advanced glycation end products; PKC, protein kinase C; e-NOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; VEGF, vascular endothelial grow factor; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; PUMA, p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis; PTEN, phosphatase and TENsin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; TIGAR, TP53-Induced Glycolysis and Apoptosis Regulator; NO, nitric oxide; TxA2, Thromboxane A2; TF, tissue factor; GP, glycoprotein; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; BMK, big MAPK; PI3K, Phosphoinositide 3-kinases; NF-kB, nuclear factor kappa B; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; KLF-4, Kruppel Like Factor 4; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; BCL, B-cell lymphoma; Bft, Bacteroides fragilis toxin; MAC, membrane attack complex; LFA-1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Peri-procedural and long-term stent-related complications favored by an abnormal glycaemic status.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Potential mechanisms of benefit of novel antidiabetic agents in the setting of PCI. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; DPP4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; SGLT-2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors; NO, nitric oxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; EPCs, endothelial progenitor cells; MMPs, matrix metalloprotease; VSMCs, vascular smooth muscular cell.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., Kalesan B., Barbato E., Tonino P.A., Piroth Z., Jagic N., Möbius-Winkler S., Rioufol G., Witt N., et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:991–1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mehilli J., Byrne R.A., Tiroch K., Pinieck S., Schulz S., Kufner S., Massberg S., Laugwitz K.L., Schömig A., Kastrati A. Randomized trial of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents: The ISAR-DESIRE 2 (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stents for In-Stent Restenosis 2) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010;55:2710–2716. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bangalore S., Kumar S., Fusaro M., Amoroso N., Kirtane A.J., Byrne R.A., Williams D.O., Slater J., Cutlip D.E., Feit F. Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: Mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22,844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5170. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konigstein M., Ben-Yehuda O., Smits P.C., Love M.P., Banai S., Perlman G.Y., Golomb M., Ozan M.O., Liu M., Leon M.B., et al. Outcomes Among Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents: Analysis From the BIONICS Randomized Trial. JACC. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018;11:2467–2476. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baber U. The Challenge of Diabetes Mellitus in the Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: Are We Making Progress? JACC. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018;11:2477–2479. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.027. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances