Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 27;11(13):3715.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11133715.

Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT

Affiliations

Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT

Nicola Rosa et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

This observational study compared optic coherence tomography (OCT) and B-scan in the detection of optic disc drusen. In total, 86 eyes of 50 patients with optic disc drusen (ODD) (36 bilateral) with a mean age of 34.68 ± 23.81 years, and 54 eyes of 27 patients with papilledema, with a mean age of 35.42 years ± 17.47, were examined. Patients with ODD, diagnosed with ultrasound, underwent spectral-domain OCT evaluation. With US, 28 ODD cases were classified as large (4 buried and 24 superficial), 58 were classified as point-like (6 buried, 49 superficial and 3 mixed). Then, all patients underwent OCT. OCT was able to detect the presence of ODD and/or peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass structure (PHOMS) in 69 eyes (p < 0.001). In particular, 7 eyes (8.14%) showed the presence of ODD alone, 25 eyes (29.07%) showed only PHOMS and 37 eyes (43.02%) showed ODD and PHOMS. In 17 eyes (19.77%) no ODD or PHOMS were detected. In the papilledema group, no ODD were observed with both US and OCT. OCT showed the presence of drusen or similar lesions in only 80.23% of the cases highlighted by the US scan, so it does not allow for certain ODD diagnoses, especially in the case of buried ODD.

Keywords: B-scan; OCT; PHOMS; optic disc drusen; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasound: Large optic disc drusen, visible as a highly reflective structure with posterior shadowing at the optic nerve level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ultrasound: Point-like optic disc drusen, visible as a highly reflective structure with a small posterior shadowing at the optic nerve level.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Optical coherence tomography: Large optic disc drusen, visible as a hypo-reflective structures with a total or partial hyperreflective margin, as described by the Optic Disc Drusen Studies (ODDS) Consortium. The hyperreflective margin is often more evident superiorly and can be difficult to detect.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Optical coherence tomography: A hyperreflective peripapillary structure similar to an ovoid mass peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass structure (PHOMS), as described in patients with optic disc drusen.

References

    1. Vitiello L., De Bernardo M., Nuzio S.G., Mandato C., Rosa N., Vajro P. Pediatric liver diseases and ocular changes: What hepatologists and ophthalmologists should know and share with each other. Dig. Liver Dis. 2020;52:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.11.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Bernardo M., Vitiello L., Rosa N. Ocular ultrasonography to detect intracranial pressure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2020;7:1459–1460. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Bernardo M., Vitiello L., Rosa N. A-scan ultrasonography and optic nerve sheath diameter assessment during acute elevations in intra-abdominal pressure. Surgery. 2020;167:1023–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.01.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayreh S.S. Pathogenesis of optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2016;50:108–144. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.10.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saenz R., Cheng H., Prager T.C., Frishman L.J., Tang R.A. Use of A-scan Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography to Differentiate Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2017;94:1081–1089. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources