Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):1775.
doi: 10.3390/plants11131775.

Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid to Mitigate Water Stress in Tomato

Affiliations

Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid to Mitigate Water Stress in Tomato

Eduardo Santana Aires et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Salicylic acid (SA) is an important plant regulator reported as a mitigator of water deficit in plants, however without a recommendation for use in field conditions. Thus, this research aims to validate the use of SA under field conditions in regions with low water availability. For that, we evaluated CO2 assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), water use efficiency (WUE), and carboxylation efficiency (A/Ci) at 15, 30, and 45 days of continuous stress water deficit, as well as the application of salicylic acid (0.0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5; 2.0 mM) in tomato plants subjected to continuous water deficit (45 days), in two years (2019 and 2020). The water deficit reduced the A, gs, E and A/Ci, while the foliar application of SA increased these parameters in all evaluated times, resulting in similar or even higher values than in plants without water deficit. Water deficit caused floral abortion in tomato plants, without the application of SA, reducing the number of fruit production. In contrast, plants that received about 1.3 mM of SA increased A and A/Ci and translocated the photo-assimilates, mainly to flowers and fruits, reducing floral abortion and increasing fruit production. Thus, foliar application of SA was efficient in mitigating the deleterious effects of water deficit in tomato plants regarding the gas exchange and fruit production.

Keywords: Solanum lycopersicum; floral abortion; photosynthesis; plant regulation; water deficit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average, maximum, and minimum temperatures (°C); Relative air humidity (%) inside the greenhouse during 2019 (A) and 2020 (B) cycles. DAS—Days after sowing.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CO2 assimilation rate (A) at 15 (A), 30 (C), and 45 (E) days of water deficit (DWD); stomatal conductance (gs) at 15 (B), 30 (D), and 45 (F) DWD in tomato plants subjected to application of salicylic acid (SA) doses in two consecutive years, 2019 and 2020. ** Highly Significant at 5% probability. α Indicates an equal and significant effect between treatments by Dunnett’s Test at 5% probability in the 2019 cycle and β in the 2020 cycle. The bars show the standard deviation. n = 4 (number of replicates).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Internal concentration of CO2 (Ci) at 15 (A), 30 (C), and 45 (E) days of water deficit (DWD); transpiration (E) at 15 (B), 30 (D), and 45 (F) DWD of tomato plants subjected to application of salicylic acid (SA) doses in two consecutive years 2019 and 2020. ** Highly Significant at 5% probability; α Indicates that there was an equal and significant effect between treatments by the Dunnett’s Test at 5% probability in the 2019 cycle and β in the 2020 cycle. The bars show the standard deviation. n = 4 (number of replicates).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Water use efficiency (WUE) at 15 (A), 30 (C), and 45 (E) days of water deficit (DWD); carboxylation efficiency (A/Ci) at 15 (B), 30 (D), and 45 (F) DWD of tomato plants submitted to the application of salicylic acid (SA) doses in two consecutive years (2019 and 2020). ** Highly Significant at 5% probability; α Indicates that there was an equal and significant effect between treatments by Dunnett’s Test at 5% probability in the 2019 cycle and β in the 2020 cycle. The bars show the standard deviation. n = 4 (number of replicates).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Total production (A), commercial production (B), total number of fruits (TNF) (C), and commercial number of fruits (CNF) (D) of tomato plants submitted to the application of doses of salicylic acid (SA) and water deficit in two consecutive years (2019 and 2020). ** Highly Significant at 5% probability; α Indicates that there was an equal and significant effect between treatments by the Dunnett’s Test at 5% probability in the 2019 cycle and β in the 2020 cycle. The bars show the standard deviation. n = 4 (number of replicates).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Graphical abstract of Foliar application of salicylic acid to mitigate water stress in tomato.

References

    1. Gomes A.M.F., Nhantumbo N., Ferreira-Pinto M., Massinga R., Ramalho J.C., Ribeiro-Barros A. Legume Crops—Characterization and Breeding for Improved Food Security. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2019. Breeding Elite Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Varieties for Improved Food Security and Income in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges; pp. 626–640. - DOI
    1. Hasanuzzaman M., Fugita M., Oku H., Islam M.T. Plant Tolerance to Environmental Stress: Role of Phytoprotectants. 1st ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2019. p. 488.
    1. Ullah H., Luc P.D., Gautam A., Datta A. Growth, Yield and Silicon Uptake of Rice (Oryza sativa) As Influenced by Dose and Timing of Silicon Application under Water-Deficit Stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2018;64:318–330. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2017.1350782. - DOI
    1. Sirisuntornlak N., Ghafoori S., Datta A., Arirob W. Seed Priming and Soil Incorporation with Silicon Influence Growth and Yield of Maize under Water-Deficit Stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019;65:197–207. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1492713. - DOI
    1. Chakma R., Biswas A., Saekong P., Ullah H., Datta A. Foliar Application and Seed Priming of Salicylic Acid Affect Growth, Fruit Yield, and Quality of Grape Tomato under Drought Stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021;280:109904. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.109904. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources