Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Nov;52(11):2691-2712.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01716-w. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

The Ergogenic Effects of Acute Carbohydrate Feeding on Resistance Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Ergogenic Effects of Acute Carbohydrate Feeding on Resistance Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Andrew King et al. Sports Med. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Carbohydrate (CHO) ingestion has an ergogenic effect on endurance training performance. Less is known about the effect of acute CHO ingestion on resistance training (RT) performance and equivocal results are reported in the literature.

Objective: The current systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine if and to what degree CHO ingestion influences RT performance.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, SportDiscus, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles written in English that used a cross-over design to assess the acute effect of CHO ingestion on RT performance outcomes (e.g., muscle strength, power, and endurance) in healthy human participants compared to a placebo or water-only conditions. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and GRADE approaches were used to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for total training session volume and post-exercise blood lactate and glucose. Sub-group meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed for categorical (session and fast durations) and continuous (total number of maximal effort sets, load used, and CHO dose) covariates, respectively.

Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 226 participants). Pooled results revealed a significant benefit of CHO ingestion in comparison to a placebo or control for total session training volume (standardised mean difference [SMD] = 0.61). Sub-group analysis revealed a significant benefit of CHO ingestion during sessions longer than 45 min (SMD = 1.02) and after a fast duration of 8 h or longer (SMD = 0.39). Pooled results revealed elevated post-exercise blood lactate (SMD = 0.58) and blood glucose (SMD = 2.36) with CHO ingestion. Meta-regression indicated that the number of maximal effort sets, but not CHO dose or load used, moderates the effect of CHO ingestion on RT performance (beta co-efficient [b] = 0.11). Carbohydrate dose does not moderate post-exercise lactate accumulation nor do maximal effort sets completed, load used, and CHO dose moderate the effect of CHO ingestion on post-exercise blood glucose.

Conclusions: Carbohydrate ingestion has an ergogenic effect on RT performance by enhancing volume performance, which is more likely to occur when sessions exceed 45 min and where the fast duration is ≥ 8 h. Further, the effect is moderated by the number of maximal effort sets completed, but not the load used or CHO dose. Post-exercise blood lactate is elevated following CHO ingestion but may come at the expense of an extended time-course of recovery due to the additional training volume performed. Post-exercise blood glucose is elevated when CHO is ingested during RT, but it is presently unclear if it has an impact on RT performance.

Protocol registration: The original protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (Project identifier: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HJFBW ).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andrew King, Eric Helms, Caryn Zinn, and Ivan Jukic declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Literature search flow chart. CHO carbohydrate, n number of studies,
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment for all included studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Random-effects meta-analysis of the effect of acute CHO ingestion on total training session volume compared to a placebo or water only. Sub-group analysis based on session (a) and fast (b) duration separately. CHO carbohydrate, CI confidence interval, SMD standardised mean difference
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mixed-effects meta-regression of the effect of acute CHO ingestion on RT volume performance compared to a placebo or water only while controlling for the effects of CHO dose (a), maximal effort sets completed (b), and load used (c). Larger data points received greater weighting than smaller data points. Solid lines represent the estimated relationship and dotted lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. BM body mass, CHO carbohydrate, IRM 1-repetition maximum, RT resistance training
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Random-effects meta-analysis of the effect of acute CHO ingestion on post-exercise blood lactate accumulation compared to a placebo or water only. Sub-group analysis based on session duration and post-exercise lactate CHO carbohydrate, CI confidence interval, SMD standardised mean difference
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Random-effects meta-analysis of the effect of acute CHO ingestion on post-exercise blood glucose concentration compared to a placebo or water only. Sub-group analysis based on session (a) and fast (b) duration separately. CHO carbohydrate, CI confidence interval, SMD standardised mean difference
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mixed-effects meta-regression of the effect of acute CHO ingestion on post-exercise blood lactate and glucose compared to a placebo or water only while controlling for the effects of CHO dose on post-exercise lactate (a) and total number of maximal effort sets (b), CHO dose (c), and load used (d) on post-exercise blood glucose. Larger data points received greater weighting than smaller data points. Solid lines represent the estimated relationship and dotted lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. BM body mass, CHO carbohydrate, CI confidence interval, IRM 1-repetition maximum, SMD standardised mean difference

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Romijn J, Coyle E, Sidossis L, Gastaldelli A, Horowitz J, Endert E, et al. Regulation of endogenous fat and carbohydrate metabolism in relation to exercise intensity and duration. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1993;265(3):E380–E391. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1993.265.3.E380. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Loon LJ, Greenhaff PL, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Saris WH, Wagenmakers AJ. The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilisation in humans. J Physiol. 2001;536(1):295–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00295.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vigh-Larsen JF, Ørtenblad N, Spriet LL, Overgaard K, Mohr M. Muscle glycogen metabolism and high-intensity exercise performance: a narrative review. Sports Med. 2021;51(9):1855–1874. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01475-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, French DN. Resistance training for health and performance. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1(3):165–171. doi: 10.1249/00149619-200206000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ormsbee MJ, Bach CW, Baur DA. Pre-exercise nutrition: the role of macronutrients, modified starches and supplements on metabolism and endurance performance. Nutrients. 2014;6(5):1782–1808. doi: 10.3390/nu6051782. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources