Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Sep:172:264-275.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.035. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

Phase 2 study of anti-disialoganglioside antibody, dinutuximab, in combination with GM-CSF in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase 2 study of anti-disialoganglioside antibody, dinutuximab, in combination with GM-CSF in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

Pooja Hingorani et al. Eur J Cancer. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Novel effective therapies are urgently needed in recurrent osteosarcoma. GD2 is expressed in human osteosarcoma tumours and cell lines. This study evaluated the disease control rate (DCR) in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma treated with the anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab plus cytokine therapy as compared to historical outcomes.

Methods: AOST1421 was a single-arm Phase 2 study for patients with recurrent pulmonary osteosarcoma in complete surgical remission. Patients received up to five cycles of dinutuximab (70 mg/m2/cycle) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Two different dinutuximab infusion schedules were studied: 35 mg/m2/day over 20 h (2 days) and 17.5 mg/m2/day over 10 h (4 days). Primary end point was DCR, defined as a proportion of patients event free at 12 months from enrolment. The historical benchmark was 12-month DCR of 20% (95% CI 10-34%). Dinutuximab would be considered effective if ≥ 16/39 patients remained event free. Secondary objectives included toxicity evaluation and pharmacokinetics.

Results: Thirty-nine eligible patients were included in the outcome analysis. Dinutuximab did not demonstrate evidence of efficacy as 11/39 patients remained event free for a DCR of 28.2% (95% CI 15-44.9%). One of 136 administered therapy cycles met criteria for unacceptable toxicity when a patient experienced sudden death of unknown cause. Other ≥ Grade 3 toxicities included pain, diarrhoea, hypoxia, and hypotension. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in the two schedules.

Conclusions: The combination of dinutuximab with GM-CSF did not significantly improve DCR in recurrent osteosarcoma. Dinutuximab toxicity and pharmacokinetics in adolescent and young adult osteosarcoma patients were similar to younger patients. Other strategies for targeting GD2 in osteosarcoma are being developed.

Keywords: Dinutuximab; GD2; Recurrent osteosarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SGD has received consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, and Jazz as well as travel expenses from Loxo, Roche, and Salarius. MDK has received consulting fees from Merck, Sharpe and Dhome. KAJ has received consulting fees from Bayer and Ipsen and honoraria from Takeda and Foundation Medicine. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1a:
Figure 1a:
Study design schema for AOST1421
Figure 1b:
Figure 1b:
CONSORT diagram showing patient allocation and disposition
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free and overall survival in 39 patients with relapsed osteosarcoma treated with dinutuximab after complete surgical resection of recurrent disease.

References

    1. Hawkins DS, Arndt CA. Pattern of disease recurrence and prognostic factors in patients with osteosarcoma treated with contemporary chemotherapy. Cancer 2003;98(11):2447–56 doi 10.1002/cncr.11799. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Branscheid D, Carrle D, Friedel G, Helmke K, et al. Second and subsequent recurrences of osteosarcoma: presentation, treatment, and outcomes of 249 consecutive cooperative osteosarcoma study group patients. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(4):557–65 doi 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.2305. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roth M, Linkowski M, Tarim J, Piperdi S, Sowers R, Geller D, et al. Ganglioside GD2 as a therapeutic target for antibody-mediated therapy in patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer 2014;120(4):548–54 doi 10.1002/cncr.28461. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heiner JP, Miraldi F, Kallick S, Makley J, Neely J, Smith-Mensah WH, et al. Localization of GD2-specific monoclonal antibody 3F8 in human osteosarcoma. Cancer Res 1987;47(20):5377–81. - PubMed
    1. Yu AL, Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, London WB, Kreissman SG, Chen HX, et al. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363(14):1324–34 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa0911123. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances