Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;14(6):765-772.
doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

The design and implementation of an undergraduate health professional degree elective course on scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal

Affiliations

The design and implementation of an undergraduate health professional degree elective course on scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal

Aisha Osman et al. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Strong writing skills are critical to the pharmacy profession. This paper describes the design, delivery, and impact of a course intended to develop pharmacy students' scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal skills.

Educational activity and setting: The course was offered in the final year of an undergraduate pharmacy program with students whose first language is not English. In this course, students write two structured pharmacy review articles (PRA) based on assigned scientific research articles and peer assess each others' written PRAs. Students also critically appraise scientific research articles on a weekly basis, complete one pre-journal club written reflective critique based on a assigned scientific research article, and moderate one journal club session.

Findings: Course rubrics were developed and validated by the course coordinators. A survey administered to students enrolled in the course identified that 85% of the students perceived that they gained adequate writing skills in the course. More than 70% of the students indicated they had the necessary skills to evaluate their peers' written assessments, and 93% felt comfortable providing and receiving feedback from peers. More than 90% of the students indicated that writing PRAs and the peer assessment improved their critical and analytical skills.

Summary: This course improved students' scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal skills. Further practice is required to reinforce the skills learned and to strengthen the writing skills of students.

Keywords: Critical appraisal; Non-native English speakers; Peer assessment; Pharmacy curriculum; Scientific writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources