Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
- PMID: 35810226
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12038-6
Does Residual Cancer Burden Predict Local Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
Abstract
Background: The extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can be quantified by the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB), a prognostic tool used to estimate survival outcomes in breast cancer. This study investigated the association between RCB and locoregional recurrence (LRR).
Methods: The study reviewed 532 women with breast cancer who underwent NAC between 2010 and 2016. Relapse in the ipsilateral breast, skin/subcutis at the surgical site, chest wall, pectoralis, or regional lymph nodes defined an LRR. The LRR cumulative incidence (LRCI) was estimated using the Fine and Gray competing-risks model, with death and distant recurrence defined as competing events. The association of LRCI with prognostic variables was evaluated.
Results: Overall, 5.5% of the patients experienced an LRR after a median follow-up period of 65 months. The 5-year LRCI rates by RCB were as follows: RCB-0 (0.9%), RCB-1 (3.2%), RCB-2 (6.0%), and RCB-3 (12.9%). In the univariable analysis, LRCI varied significantly by RCB (p = 0.010). The multivariable analysis showed a significant association of LRCI with increasing RCB, and the patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) phenotype were at lower risk for LRR than those with HER2+ and triple-negative cancers (p < 0.032). The patients with RCB-3 were at a higher risk for local relapse than those with RCB-0 (hazard ratio, 13.78; confidence interval, 2.25-84.45; p = 0.04). Type of operation (p = 0.04) and use of adjuvant radiation (p = 0.046) were statistically significant in the multivariable model.
Conclusions: The study results demonstrate a significant association between LRCI and increasing RCB, although distant recurrence is a substantial driver of disease outcomes. Future prospective studies should examine the role of RCB in clinical decisions regarding indications for adjuvant therapy.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.
References
-
- Rubens RD, Sexton S, Tong D, Winter PJ, Knight RK, Hayward JL. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1980;16:351–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2964(80)90352-7 . - DOI
-
- Amoroso V, Generali D, Buchholz T, et al. International expert consensus on primary systemic therapy in the management of early breast cancer: highlights of the Fifth Symposium on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Breast Cancer, Cremona, Italy (2013). J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2015;2015:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgv023 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595 . - DOI
-
- Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:188–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji021 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- (EBCTCG) EBCTCG. Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5 . - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous