Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug:161:107144.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107144. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection and HPV testing in Eswatini

Affiliations

Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection and HPV testing in Eswatini

Themba G Ginindza et al. Prev Med. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

In 2009, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) followed by cryotherapy (VIA-and-cryotherapy), was introduced into the Eswatini cervical cancer prevention programme. We present screening results of 654 women attending VIA-and-cryotherapy who participated in a sexually transmitted infections prevalence study, at which samples for HPV DNA testing and liquid-based cytology (LBC) were also collected. VIA positives (VIA+) ineligible for cryotherapy, suspected cancers and women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (HSIL+) on LBC were referred for diagnosis and treatment. Women with negative VIA who were HPV positive (HPV+) and those VIA+ treated with cryotherapy were recalled for another VIA one-year later. The positivity rates of VIA, HPV, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse cytology abnormalities (LBC ASCUS+) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (LBC LSIL+) were 9.7%, 42.6%, 13.2% and 5.3%, respectively. HPV testing detected 29 of 31 LSIL+ (93.6%, 95%CI: 78.6-99.2) while VIA only detected 11 (35.6%, 95%CI: 19.2-54.6). The HIV prevalence was 43% (95%CI: 39.2-46.9). HIV positives were at increased risk of being VIA+ (age-adjusted odds ratio: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.5-4.3), HPV+ (3.7, 2.6-5.3) and having LSIL+ (16.3, 4.9-54.8). The ineligibility rates for cryotherapy were 38% (24 of 63 VIA+), and 46% among HIV positives (18 of 39 VIA+). HPV testing was substantially more sensitive than VIA, thus, HPV followed by ablative treatment may be more effective. However, the high ineligibility for cryotherapy highlights the need for improving the assessment of eligibility for ablative treatment and for strengthening colposcopy, particularly in populations with high HIV prevalence.

Keywords: Cervical cancer screening; Eswatini; HIV; HPV testing; Screen-and-treat; WHO guidelines on cervical screening and treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the cervical screening process. VIA: visual inspection after acetic acid; NEG: Negative; POS: Positive; HPV: human papillomavirus testing; LBC: liquid-based cytology; HSIL: high-squamous intraepithelial lesions on LBC; HSIL+: HSIL or worse lesions on LBC.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prevalence of high-risk HPV among HIV negative and HIV positive women by cytology grade within different age groups. ASCUS: includes atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) LBC results. LSIL+: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse LBC results.

References

    1. Almonte M., et al. Visual inspection after acetic acid (VIA) is highly heterogeneous in primary cervical screening in Amazonian Peru. PLoS One. 2015;10(1) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M., et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020;8(2):e191–e203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bicego G.T., et al. Recent patterns in population-based HIV prevalence in Swaziland. PLoS One. 2013;8(10) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brisson M., et al. Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):575–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vuyst H., et al. HIV, human papillomavirus, and cervical neoplasia and cancer in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2008;17(6):545–554. - PubMed

Publication types