Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 23:10:922570.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.922570. eCollection 2022.

Low-Stiffness Hydrogels Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Through the Rapid Release of Exosomes

Affiliations

Low-Stiffness Hydrogels Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Through the Rapid Release of Exosomes

Zhixiao Liu et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

A hydrogel system loaded with mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome (MSC-Exos) is an attractive new tool for tissue regeneration. However, the effect of the stiffness of exosome-loaded hydrogels on tissue regeneration is unclear. Here, the role of exosome-loaded hydrogel stiffness, during the regeneration of injured nerves, was assessed in vivo. The results showed that the photocrosslinkable hyaluronic acid methacrylate hydrogel stiffness plays an important role in repairing nerve injury. Compared with the stiff hydrogels loaded with exosomes, soft hydrogels loaded with exosomes showed better repair of injured peripheral nerves. The soft hydrogel promoted nerve repair by quickly releasing exosomes to inhibit the infiltration of macrophages and the expression of the proinflammatory factors IL-1β and TNF-α in injured nerves. Our work revealed that exosome-loaded hydrogel stiffness plays an important role in tissue regeneration by regulating exosome release behavior and provided important clues for the clinical application of biological scaffold materials.

Keywords: exosome release behavior; hydrogel stiffness; mesenchymal stem cell–derived exosomes; nerve injury inflammation; sciatic nerve injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Hydrogel-loaded exosomes for the treatment of sciatic nerve injury. (A) Characterization of human umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stem cell–derived exosomes (left: TEM of exosomes, bar = 200 nm; right: Western blot characterization of exosome marker proteins). (B) Fluorescence 3D imaging of hydrogels loaded with PKH26-labeled exosomes (red: PKH26, bar = 50 μm). (C) Rat SNCI model. Different concentrations of HAMA solution mixed with exosomes were injected into the injured nerve, and after curing with ultraviolet light, the hydrogels with different mechanical properties were formed at the nerve injury site (I, uninjured rat sciatic nerve; II, injured sciatic nerve; and III, injured nerve embedded in hydrogel).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Soft hydrogel–loaded exosomes can better repair injured nerves. (A) Rat hind footprints were collected after surgery, and the SFI was used to evaluate the functional recovery of the injured sciatic nerve (left: typical footprint pattern, 7 days, bar = 1 cm; right: SFI score, 14 days). Con: surgery group, sham: sham operation group, con vs. sham p = 1.71649E-4; soft: soft hydrogel treatment group, soft vs. con p = 0.01813); and stiff: stiff hydrogel treatment group, soft vs. stiff p = 0.02697. (B) Wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle and the cross-sectional area of the gastrocnemius muscle fibers. (left: photographs of rat gastrocnemius muscles on the operative and nonoperative sides and HE-stained images of the transverse section of the gastrocnemius muscle on the operating side, bar = 1 cm black, bar = 100 μm yellow).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Soft hydrogels loaded with exosomes better repair nerve damage by inhibiting inflammation. (A) H&E staining imaging of the injured nerves (left: 14 days, bar = 1,000 μm black, bar = 100 μm yellow). Immunohistochemistry imaging of IL-1β and TNF-α (right: 14 days, bar = 50 μm red). (B) Immunofluorescence imaging of the injured nerves (1 day, bar = 50 μm, green: CD68, blue: DAPI).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Rapid release of exosomes mediated by soft hydrogels inhibits macrophage inflammation. (A) After 24 h, the hydrogel-embedded sciatic nerves were collected, and the frozen sections were imaged under a fluorescence microscope. Image analysis showed that compared with the stiff hydrogel–embedded sciatic nerves, the sciatic nerves embedded in the soft hydrogels had a larger fluorescent area (p = 0.00162, n = 5) and higher IOD (p = 0.01827, n = 5; bar = 200 μm). (B) Hydrogels with different stiffnesses were loaded with PKH26-labeled exosomes and incubated with THP1 cells and PMA (100 ng/ml). After 24 h, the cells were imaged under a laser confocal microscope (bar = 250 μm). Image analysis shows that compared with the cells grown on stiff hydrogels, the cells grown on soft hydrogels had a larger fluorescent area (p = 0.00101, n = 15) and higher IOD (p = 0.00201, n = 15). (C) After PMA (100 ng/ml) induced THP1 to adhere to the wall (con), LPS (100 ng/ml) was used to induce the cells to differentiate into M1 for 12 h (LPS). Then, the cells were treated with different concentrations of exosomes to detect the expression of the related genes, IL-1β and TNF-α (IL-1β: con vs. LPS p = 6.57496E-5, LPS vs. 10 μg/ml p = 7.66959E-4, 10 μg/ml vs. 100 μg/ml p = 3.2624E-4; TNF-α: con vs. LPS p = 9.737936E-4, LPS vs. 10 μg/ml p = 0.00355, 10 μg/ml vs. 100 μg/ml p = 1.63632E-4; n = 3). (D) Schematic diagram of the mechanism by which exosome release affects damaged nerve repair. The rapid release of exosomes from the soft hydrogel can reduce macrophages and the expression of proinflammatory IL-1β and TNF-α in M1 macrophages, thereby promoting the repair of the injured nerve. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; and ***p < 0.001, t test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akar E., Tural Emon S., Tural Emon S., Efendioglu M., Erdogan B., Engin T., et al. (2021). Effects of Tamoxifen Therapy on Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury: An Experimental Study in Rats. Aott 55 (2), 87–93. 10.5152/j.aott.2021.19183 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang F., Wang Y., Liu P., Peng J., Han G.-H., Ding X., et al. (2019). Role of Macrophages in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair. Neural Regen. Res. 14 (8), 1335–1342. 10.4103/1673-5374.253510 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaudhuri O., Cooper-White J., Janmey P. A., Mooney D. J., Shenoy V. B. (2020). Effects of Extracellular Matrix Viscoelasticity on Cellular Behaviour. Nature 584 (7822), 535–546. 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen T., Li Y., Ni W., Tang B., Wei Y., Li J., et al. (2020). Human Neural Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium Inhibits Inflammation in Macrophages via Sirt-1 Signaling Pathway In Vitro and Promotes Sciatic Nerve Injury Recovery in Rats. Stem Cells Dev. 29 (16), 1084–1095. 10.1089/scd.2020.0020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng L., Zhang K., Wu S., Cui M., Xu T. (2017). Focus on Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: Opportunities and Challenges in Cell-free Therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 1–10. 10.1155/2017/6305295 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources