Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 22:13:876292.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876292. eCollection 2022.

Differential Predictive Effect of Self-Regulation Behavior and the Combination of Self- vs. External Regulation Behavior on Executive Dysfunctions and Emotion Regulation Difficulties, in University Students

Affiliations

Differential Predictive Effect of Self-Regulation Behavior and the Combination of Self- vs. External Regulation Behavior on Executive Dysfunctions and Emotion Regulation Difficulties, in University Students

Jesús de la Fuente et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish linear relations (association and prediction) and inferential relations between three constructs at different levels of psychological research - executive dysfunction (microanalysis), self-regulation (molecular level), and self- vs. external regulation (molar level), in the prediction of emotion regulation difficulties. We hypothesized that personal and contextual regulatory factors would be negatively related to levels of executive dysfunction and emotion regulation difficulties; by way of complement, non-regulatory and dysregulatory personal, and contextual factors would be positively related to these same difficulties. To establish relationships, we used a retrospective, ex post facto design, where 298 university students voluntarily participated by completing standardized self-reports. Linear and structural correlational, predictive analyses were performed, as well as inferential analyses. Results were consistent and validated the proposed hypotheses, for both association and prediction. The most important result refers to the discriminant value of the five-level combination heuristic for predicting Executive Function and External (contextual) Dys-Regulation. In conclusion: (1) both personal and contextual regulation factors must be analyzed in order to better understand the variation in executive functions and emotion regulation difficulties; (2) it is important to continue connecting the different levels of the constructs referring to self-regulation, given their complementary role in the behavioral analysis of regulation difficulties.

Keywords: emotion regulation difficulties; executive functions; self- vs. external regulation; self-regulation; university students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Structural predictive model of relationships. EF, Executive Dysfunction; SRER, Self-regulation vs. External regulation; ERD, Emotion Regulation Difficulties; SR, Self-regulation; SRH, Self-Regulation in Health; NRH, Non-Regulation in Health; DRH, Dys-Regulation in Health; ERH, External-Regulation in Health; NRH, External Non-Regulation in Health; EDRH, External Dys-Regulation in Health.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed S., Tang S., Waters N. E., Davis-Kean P. (2019). Executive function and academic achievement: longitudinal relations from early childhood to adolescence. J. Educ. Psychol. 111 446–458. 10.1037/edu0000296 - DOI
    1. Anderson P. J., Reidy N. (2012). Assessing executive function in preschoolers. Neuropsychol. Rev. 22 345–360. 10.1007/s11065-012-9220-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews K., Atkinson L., Harris M., Gonzalez A. (2021). Examining the effects of household chaos on child executive functions: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 147 16–32. 10.1037/bul0000311 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arbuckle J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0). Chicago, IL: IBM SPSS.
    1. Ato M., López J., Benavente A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación [a classification system for research designs]. An. Psicología 29 1038–1059. 10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources