Wellbeing as Capability: Findings in Hearing-Impaired Adolescents and Young Adults With a Hearing Aid or Cochlear Implant
- PMID: 35814130
- PMCID: PMC9261909
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895868
Wellbeing as Capability: Findings in Hearing-Impaired Adolescents and Young Adults With a Hearing Aid or Cochlear Implant
Abstract
In the Western world, for deaf and hard-of-hearing children, hearing aids or cochlear implants are available to provide access to sound, with the overall goal of increasing their wellbeing. If and how this goal is achieved becomes increasingly multifarious when these children reach adolescence and young adulthood and start to participate in society in other ways. An approach to wellbeing that includes personal differences and the relative advantages and disadvantages that people have, is the capability approach, as developed by Nobel Prize laureate Amartya Sen. Capability is the set of real opportunities people have to do and be things they have reason to value. We interviewed 59 young people, aged 13 through 25, with cochlear implants (37) or hearing aids (22) to capture their capability. We found that their hearing devices enabled them to actively participate in a predominantly hearing society, with few differences between cochlear implant and hearing aid recipients. They did, however, report challenges associated with prejudices and expectations, and with feeling poorly understood, all of which appeared to impact their capability. Through the lens of capability, alleged differences between hearing aid and cochlear implant recipients began to fade. We discuss the implications for initiatives focused on the long-term support young recipients of hearing devices to meet their specific requirements over time.
Keywords: capability approach; conversion factors; functionings; hard-of-hearing; hearing aids.
Copyright © 2022 Rijke, Vermeulen, Willeboer, Knoors, Langereis and van der Wilt.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
[Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;26(19):868-70, 873. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 23285948 Chinese.
-
Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?Ear Hear. 2001 Oct;22(5):365-80. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200110000-00002. Ear Hear. 2001. PMID: 11605945
-
Capability of deaf children with a cochlear implant.Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jul;43(14):1989-1994. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1689580. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Disabil Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 31724886
-
The Role of Statistical Learning in Understanding and Treating Spoken Language Outcomes in Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Aug 14;49(3S):723-739. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0138. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018. PMID: 30120449 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social participation of children and adolescents with cochlear implants: a qualitative analysis of parent, teacher, and child interviews.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):474-93. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr001. Epub 2011 Mar 3. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 21372111 Review.
References
-
- Alkire S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
-
- Antia S., Kreimeyer K., Metz K., Spolsky S. C. (2012). Peer interactions of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Stud. Lang. Educ. 1, 1–28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199750986.013.0013 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources