Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 23:13:895868.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895868. eCollection 2022.

Wellbeing as Capability: Findings in Hearing-Impaired Adolescents and Young Adults With a Hearing Aid or Cochlear Implant

Affiliations

Wellbeing as Capability: Findings in Hearing-Impaired Adolescents and Young Adults With a Hearing Aid or Cochlear Implant

Wouter J Rijke et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In the Western world, for deaf and hard-of-hearing children, hearing aids or cochlear implants are available to provide access to sound, with the overall goal of increasing their wellbeing. If and how this goal is achieved becomes increasingly multifarious when these children reach adolescence and young adulthood and start to participate in society in other ways. An approach to wellbeing that includes personal differences and the relative advantages and disadvantages that people have, is the capability approach, as developed by Nobel Prize laureate Amartya Sen. Capability is the set of real opportunities people have to do and be things they have reason to value. We interviewed 59 young people, aged 13 through 25, with cochlear implants (37) or hearing aids (22) to capture their capability. We found that their hearing devices enabled them to actively participate in a predominantly hearing society, with few differences between cochlear implant and hearing aid recipients. They did, however, report challenges associated with prejudices and expectations, and with feeling poorly understood, all of which appeared to impact their capability. Through the lens of capability, alleged differences between hearing aid and cochlear implant recipients began to fade. We discuss the implications for initiatives focused on the long-term support young recipients of hearing devices to meet their specific requirements over time.

Keywords: capability approach; conversion factors; functionings; hard-of-hearing; hearing aids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alkire S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Anmyr L., Olsson M., Larson K., Freijd A. (2011). Children with hearing impairment – living with cochlear implants or hearing aids. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 75, 844–849. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antia S., Kreimeyer K., Metz K., Spolsky S. C. (2012). Peer interactions of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Stud. Lang. Educ. 1, 1–28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199750986.013.0013 - DOI
    1. Byatt T. J., Duncan J., Dally K., Beuzeville L. (2021). Evolving identities of adolescents who are deaf or hard of hearing: a scoping review. Am. Ann. Deaf 166, 5–30. doi: 10.1353/aad.2021.0008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castellanos I., Kronenberger W. G., Pisoni D. B. (2018). Psychosocial outcomes in long-term Cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 39, 527–539. doi: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000504, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources