Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul-Aug;12(4):1102-1113.
doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Demonstration of Gut-Barrier Dysfunction in Early Stages of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Proof-Of-Concept Study

Affiliations

Demonstration of Gut-Barrier Dysfunction in Early Stages of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Proof-Of-Concept Study

Kanav Kaushal et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background/aims: Gut-barrier dysfunction is well recognized in pathogenesis of both non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). However, comparison of components of this dysfunction between the two etiologies remains unexplored especially in early stages of NAFLD.

Methods: Components of gut-barrier dysfunction like alterations in intestinal permeability (IP) by lactulose mannitol ratio (LMR) in urine, systemic endotoxemia (IgG and IgM anti-endotoxin antibodies), systemic inflammation (serum tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α] and interleukin-1 [IL-1] levels), tight junction (TJ) proteins expression in duodenal biopsy and stool microbiota composition using Oxford Nanopore MinION device were prospectively evaluated in patients with NAFLD (n = 34) with no cirrhosis, ALD (n = 28) and were compared with disease free controls (n = 20).

Results: Patients with ALD had more advanced disease than those with NAFLD (median liver stiffness -NAFLD:7.1 kPa [5.9-8.9] vs. ALD:14.3 kPa [9.6-24], P < 0.001]. Median LMR was significantly higher in NAFLD and ALD group when compared to controls (NAFLD 0.054 [0.037-0.17] vs. controls 0.027 [0.021-0.045] (P = 0.001)) and ALD 0.043 [0.03-0.068] vs. controls 0.027 [0.021-0.045] (P = 0.019)]. Anti-endotoxin antibody titer (IgM) (MMU/mL) was lowest in NAFLD 72.9 [3.2-1089.5] compared to ALD 120.6 [20.1-728]) (P = 0.042) and controls 155.3 [23.8-442.9]) (P = 0.021). Median TNF-α (pg/mL) levels were elevated in patients with NAFLD (53.3 [24.5-115]) compared to controls (16.1 [10.8-33.3]) (P < 0.001) and ALD (12.3 [10.1-42.7]) (P < 0.001). Expression of zonulin-1 and claudin-3 in duodenal mucosa was lowest in NAFLD. On principal co-ordinate analysis (PCoA), the global bacterial composition was significantly different across the three groups (PERMANOVA test, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: While remaining activated in both etiologies, gut-barrier dysfunction abnormalities were more pronounced in NAFLD at early stages compared to ALD despite more advanced disease in the latter.

Keywords: ALD, alcoholic liver disease; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; IL-1, interleukin-1; IP, intestinal permeability; KFT, kidney function test; LFT, liver function test; LMR, lactulose mannitol ratio; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; alcoholic liver disease; endotoxemia; intestinal permeability; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; tight junction protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Profile plots representing comparison of A) Intestinal permeability using lactulose mannitol (LMR) and B) systemic endotoxemia using serum IgM anti-endotoxin antibody and C) IgG anti-endotoxin antibody levels and D) systemic inflammatory response by measuring serum IL-1 and E) TNF-α levels among controls, NAFLD and ALD patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the relative abundance at different taxonomic levels among 10 NASH patients, 10 ALD and 10 controls (A) Comparison of Alpha diversity among the three cohorts (Shannon diversity). (B) Principal component analysis showing the overall structure of gut microbiota in the three groups, showing three different clusters with slight overlaps. (C) Abundance variation of the 6 major phyla across the three cohorts (D) Comparison of Bacteroides/Firmicutes ratio across 3 cohorts (E) Comparison of genus composition across the three cohorts.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heatmaps showing the comparison of relative abundance of various genera between A) NAFLD and controls and B) ALD and controls.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albillos A., de Gottardi A., Rescigno M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy. J Hepatol. 2020;72:558–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mu Q., Kirby J., Reilly C.M., Luo X.M. Leaky gut as a danger signal for autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8:598. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00598. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spadoni I., Zagato E., Bertocchi A., et al. A gut-vascular barrier controls the systemic dissemination of bacteria. Science. 2015;350:830–834. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0135. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacFie J. Current status of bacterial translocation as a cause of surgical sepsis. Br Med Bull. 2005;71:1–11. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldh029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zihni C., Mills C., Matter K., Balda M.S. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:564–580. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.80. - DOI - PubMed