Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 5;4(7):e0726.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000726. eCollection 2022 Jul.

β-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: Weighing the Challenges and Opportunities to Assess Clinical Value

Affiliations
Review

β-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: Weighing the Challenges and Opportunities to Assess Clinical Value

Thomas J Dilworth et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

Objective: β-lactams are the cornerstone of empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients. Recently, there have been calls to use β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) within 24-48 hours after the initiation of therapy in critically ill patients. In this article, we review the dynamic physiology of critically ill patients, β-lactam dose response in critically ill patients, the impact of pathogen minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on β-lactam TDM, and pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. Additionally, we highlight available clinical data to better inform β-lactam TDM for critically ill patients.

Data sources: We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted for sepsis or septic shock at a single academic medical center who were treated with β-lactam antibiotics.

Study selection: Indexed studies in PubMed in English language were selected for review on topics relative to critical care physiology, β-lactams, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, TDM, and antibiotic susceptibility.

Data extraction: We reviewed potentially related studies on β-lactams and TDM and summarized their design, patients, and results. This is a synthetic, nonsystematic, review.

Data synthesis: In the retrospective analysis of patients treated with β-lactam antibiotics, approximately one-third of patients received less than 48 hours of β-lactam therapy. Of those who continued beyond 48 hours, only 13.7% had patient-specific factors (augmented renal clearance, fluid overload, morbid obesity, and/or surgical drain), suggesting a potential benefit of β-lactam TDM.

Conclusions: These data indicate that a strategy of comprehensive β-lactam TDM for critically ill patients is unwarranted as it has not been shown yet to improve patient-oriented outcomes. This review demonstrates that β-lactam TDM in the ICU, while laudable, layers ambiguous β-lactam exposure thresholds upon uncertain/unknown MIC data within a dynamic, unpredictable patient population for whom TDM results will not be available fast enough to significantly affect care. Judicious, targeted TDM for those with risk factors for β-lactam over- or underexposure is a better approach but requires further study. Clinically, choosing the correct antibiotic and dosing β-lactams aggressively, which have a wide therapeutic index, to overcome critical illness factors appears to give critically ill patients the best likelihood of survival.

Keywords: beta-lactam antibiotics; critically ill; intensive care unit; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Schulz reports grant funding from Merck. Dr. Micek reports being a coinvestigator on a grant from Merck. Dr. Kollef reports salary support from the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation. Dr. Rose reports research funding from Merck and Paratek and personal consulting fees from Paratek and Visante. Dr. Dilworth has disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
β-lactam serum concentration data from the DALI study. The boxplot of antibiotic concentrations observed at 50% (A) and 100% (B) of the dosing interval. Median, interquartile range, and range are presented. The y-axes are presented on a log2 scale. Used with permission from Clinical Infectious Diseases (50). DALI = defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow diagram. ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Singer M, et al. ; EPIC III Investigators: Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. JAMA 2020; 323:1478–1487 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdul-Aziz MH, Alffenaar JC, Bassetti M, et al. ; Infection Section of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and Critically Ill Patient Study Groups of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID); Infectious Diseases Group of International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT); Infections in the ICU and Sepsis Working Group of International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC): Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: A position paper. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1127–1153 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig WA: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: Rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:1–10 - PubMed
    1. Felton TW, Goodwin J, O’Connor L, et al. : Impact of Bolus dosing versus continuous infusion of Piperacillin and Tazobactam on the development of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57:5811–5819 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhaese S, Heffernan A, Liu D, et al. : Prolonged versus intermittent infusion of β-lactam antibiotics: A systematic review and meta-regression of bacterial killing in preclinical infection models. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 59:1237–1250 - PubMed