Pet ownership, loneliness, and social isolation: a systematic review
- PMID: 35816194
- PMCID: PMC9272860
- DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02332-9
Pet ownership, loneliness, and social isolation: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: Several publications explored a relationship between pet ownership and lower levels of loneliness and social isolation. However, to the best of our knowledge, no systematic review has yet synthesized the evidence on these associations. Thus, this systematic review aims to evaluate the findings regarding the relations between pet ownership, loneliness, and social isolation.
Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycInfo were searched in January 2022. Observational studies relying on appropriate instruments to assess the exposure and the outcome variables were included. Two reviewers independently executed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment.
Results: n = 24 studies were included. Among adult samples, the studies examining the relationship between pet ownership and social isolation found that owning a pet was associated with lower levels of social isolation. Concerning loneliness, studies that were conducted after the outbreak of COVID-19 mostly showed that pet ownership can contribute to lower levels of loneliness, but did not reveal an overall significant association until then. In turn, the studies that examined child and adolescent samples suggest that pet ownership was related to reduced loneliness before COVID-19. Furthermore, most of the studies did not reveal any differences between dogs, cats, and other kinds of pets regarding their relationship to loneliness and social isolation.
Conclusion: All in all, only a part of the studies detected a significant association between pet ownership, loneliness and social isolation. However, the COVID-19 pandemic seemed to strengthen this relationship, so that future research is required to assess the longevity of this potential effect.
Keywords: Animal ownership; Loneliness; Pet ownership; Social exclusion; Social isolation; Systematic review.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Oxford English Dictionary (2005) "pet". Oxford University Press. Available via Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/141778. Accessed 01/06/2022
-
- American Veterinary Medical Association (2018) AVMA Pet ownership and demographics sourcebook. 2017–2018 edition. Schaumburg IL
-
- American Pet Products Association (2021) 2021–2022 APPA national pet owners survey. Stamford CT
-
- Allen K. Are pets a healthy pleasure? The influence of pets on blood pressure. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12:236–239. doi: 10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01269.x. - DOI
-
- Smith B. The 'pet effect'–health related aspects of companion animal ownership. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(6):439–442. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
