Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Dec 1;206(11):1361-1369.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0392OC.

Efficacy and Safety of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children 6 Through 11 Years of Age with Cystic Fibrosis Heterozygous for F508del and a Minimal Function Mutation: A Phase 3b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children 6 Through 11 Years of Age with Cystic Fibrosis Heterozygous for F508del and a Minimal Function Mutation: A Phase 3b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

Marcus A Mall et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Rationale: The triple-combination regimen elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was shown to be safe and efficacious in children aged 6 through 11 years with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del-CFTR allele in a phase 3, open-label, single-arm study. Objectives: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function CFTR mutation (F/MF genotypes) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b trial. Methods: Children were randomized to receive either ELX/TEZ/IVA (n = 60) or placebo (n = 61) during a 24-week treatment period. The dose of ELX/TEZ/IVA administered was based on weight at screening, with children <30 kg receiving ELX 100 mg once daily, TEZ 50 mg once daily, and IVA 75 mg every 12 hours, and children ⩾30 kg receiving ELX 200 mg once daily, TEZ 100 mg once daily, and IVA 150 mg every 12 hours (adult dose). Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoint was absolute change in lung clearance index2.5 from baseline through Week 24. Children given ELX/TEZ/IVA had a mean decrease in lung clearance index2.5 of 2.29 units (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-2.60) compared with 0.02 units (95% CI, -0.29 to 0.34) in children given placebo (between-group treatment difference, -2.26 units; 95% CI, -2.71 to -1.81; P < 0.0001). ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment also led to improvements in the secondary endpoint of sweat chloride concentration (between-group treatment difference, -51.2 mmol/L; 95% CI, -55.3 to -47.1) and in the other endpoints of percent predicted FEV1 (between-group treatment difference, 11.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.9-15.1) and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised Respiratory domain score (between-group treatment difference, 5.5 points; 95% CI, 1.0-10.0) compared with placebo from baseline through Week 24. The most common adverse events in children receiving ELX/TEZ/IVA were headache and cough (30.0% and 23.3%, respectively); most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions: In this first randomized, controlled study of a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator conducted in children 6 through 11 years of age with F/MF genotypes, ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment led to significant improvements in lung function, as well as robust improvements in respiratory symptoms and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function. ELX/TEZ/IVA was generally safe and well tolerated in this pediatric population with no new safety findings.

Keywords: children; cystic fibrosis; elexacaftor; ivacaftor; tezacaftor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant disposition diagram. AE = adverse event; ELX/TEZ/IVA = elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Efficacy results by visit. (A) Absolute change in LCI2.5 from baseline at each visit. Lower values indicate decreased airway obstruction and improved homogeneity of ventilation. (B) Absolute change in sweat chloride concentration from baseline at each visit; lower values indicate increased CFTR function. (C) Absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline at each visit. (D) Absolute change in the respiratory domain score on the CFQ-R (child’s version) from baseline at each visit; scores normalized to a 100-point range, with higher scores indicating a higher patient-reported quality of life with regard to respiratory symptoms. Data are least-squares means based on a mixed-effects model for repeated measures; I-bars indicate the standard error of the mean, and the dashed horizontal line corresponds to the baseline. The sample size shown below the x-axis is the number of children at the time point with evaluable in-clinic data. CFQ-R = Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire Revised; ELX/TEZ/IVA = elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor; LCI2.5 = lung clearance index2.5; ppFEV1 = percent predicted FEV1.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem B, Alon N, Rozmahel R, Grzelczak Z, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science . 1989;245:1066–1073. - PubMed
    1. Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database (CFTR1) 2011. http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/
    1. The Clinical and Functional TRanslation of CFTR (CFTR2) 2011. https://cftr2.org/
    1. Riordan JR. CFTR function and prospects for therapy. Annu Rev Biochem . 2008;77:701–726. - PubMed
    1. Bell SC, Mall MA, Gutierrez H, Macek M, Madge S, Davies JC, et al. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective. Lancet Respir Med . 2020;8:65–124. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms