Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;37(1):30-38.
doi: 10.1177/08901171221113835. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

Understanding Hesitation to Use Nicotine Replacement Therapy: A Content Analysis of Posts in Online Tobacco-Cessation Support Groups

Affiliations

Understanding Hesitation to Use Nicotine Replacement Therapy: A Content Analysis of Posts in Online Tobacco-Cessation Support Groups

Connor Phillips et al. Am J Health Promot. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to better understand hesitancy to use nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to quit smoking.

Design: We content coded and analyzed NRT-related posts in online quit smoking support groups to understand NRT-use hesitancy and to examine associations with health outcomes.

Setting: NRT posts were analyzed in unmoderated social-media support groups with free NRT.

Sample: Adults who smoked daily (n = 438) and posted about NRT were studied, 339 of whom reported on NRT usage and 403 reported on smoking abstinence.

Measures: Surveys at 1-month post-quit date assessed NRT usage and smoking abstinence.

Analysis: Relationships among NRT posts, NRT usage and smoking abstinence were analyzed using GEE models accounting for support group and covariates.

Results: Nearly all (96.17%) participants reported using the study-provided NRT once, most (70.21%) used NRT during the past week, but less than half (45.72%) used NRT daily for the full month as recommended. Nearly two-thirds (65.34%) of NRT posts were negative. Posts reflecting dislike or no longer needing NRT were associated with a lower likelihood of using NRT in the past week at least once (B = -.66, P = .005 and B = -.37, P = .045), use occasions (B = -1.86, P = .018 and B = -1.10, P = .016) and used daily for full month (B = -.56, P = .044 and B = -.53, P = .009). Posts related to the effectiveness of NRT related to past-week NRT used at least once (B = .15, P = .023), used daily for full month (B = .25, P = .001), and smoking abstinence (B = .27, P = .002).

Conclusion: Strategies are needed to address dislike of NRT and strengthen perceptions of NRT efficacy, especially on social media where posts may be amplified.

Keywords: adherence; compliance; nicotine replacement therapy; smoking cessation; tobacco control; tobacco use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Count of NRT posts by day for the 36 online tobacco-cessation support groups (n = 438). Note: Positive NRT posts discussed effectiveness. Negative NRT posts encompassed the remaining categories. Numbers on top of the bars indicate the type of NRT info we provided to all participants via email or post: 1 about effectiveness, 4 irritation, 5 no longer needed, 7 perceived ineffectiveness, and 9 miscellaneous negative (see Appendix B for details).

References

    1. Hartmann-Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Bullen C, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Hartmann-Boyce J, Cahill K, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:Cd000146. - PubMed
    1. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med, 2008;35(2): 158-176. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curry SJ, Grothaus LC, McAfee T, Pabiniak C. Use and cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation services under four insurance plans in a health maintenance organization. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):673-679. - PubMed
    1. Ong MK, Glantz SA. Free nicotine replacement therapy programs vs implementing smoke-free workplaces: a cost-effectiveness comparison. Am J Publ Health. 2005;95(6):969-975. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types