Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 2:2022:7087885.
doi: 10.1155/2022/7087885. eCollection 2022.

Methylated Septin 9 as a Promising Biomarker in the Diagnosis and Recurrence Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Methylated Septin 9 as a Promising Biomarker in the Diagnosis and Recurrence Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer

Pingxia Lu et al. Dis Markers. .

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical utility of plasma methylated septin 9 (mSEPT9) DNA in screening and recurrence monitoring for colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly promising. The present study was performed to determine the diagnostic value of mSEPT9 in CRC detection and recurrence monitoring in Chinese patients.

Methods: Overall, 616 patients newly diagnosed with CRC and 122 individuals with no evidence of disease were recruited from October 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021, at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Plasma and serum samples were collected for analyzing mSEPT9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen-19-9 (CA19-9). Data on clinicopathological characteristics were collected and analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic potential of each marker; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied for the assessment of diagnostic value, and comparisons among mSEPT9, CEA, CA19-9, and their combination were assessed via ROC curves.

Results: mSEPT9 achieved an overall sensitivity and specificity of 72.94% and 81.97%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.826, which were higher than those of CEA (sensitivity: 43.96%; specificity: 96.72%; AUC: 0.789) and CA19-9 (sensitivity: 14.99%; specificity: 96.61%; AUC: 0.590). The combination of mSEPT9, CEA, and CA19-9 further improved sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value (sensitivity: 78.43%; specificity: 86.07%; AUC: 0.878), respectively. Notably, the mSEPT9 positivity rate was significantly associated with TNM stage, T stage, N stage, tumor size, vascular invasion, and nerve invasion among patients with CRC. A 100% correlation was observed between the positive results of the mSEPT9 test and recurrence or metastasis in patients after therapeutic intervention.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that mSEPT9 may represent a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC compared with CEA and CA19-9. Postoperative mSEPT9 status may represent the first noninvasive marker of CRC recurrence or metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves of single mSEPT9 (S9), CEA, CA19-9, and their combination in discriminating patients with CRC from healthy participants. (a) ROC curves of single S9, CEA, and CA19-9 in discriminating patients with CRC from healthy participants. (b) ROC curves of S9 + CEA, S9 + CA19 − 9, CEA + CA19 − 9, and S9 + CEA + CA19 − 9 in discriminating patients with CRC from healthy participants. ROC: receiver operating characteristic curve; mSEPT9: methylated septin 9; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9: carbohydrate antigen-19-9.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R. L., Torre L. A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W., Zheng R., Baade P. D., et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2016;66(2):115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uraoka T., Hosoe N., Yahagi N. Colonoscopy: is it as effective as an advanced diagnostic tool for colorectal cancer screening? Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology . 2015;9(2):129–132. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.960397. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morikawa T., Kato J., Yamaji Y., Wada R., Mitsushima T., Shiratori Y. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology . 2005;129(2):422–428. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas D. S., Fourkala E. O., Apostolidou S., et al. Evaluation of serum CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CA125 for the early detection of colorectal cancer using longitudinal preclinical samples. British Journal of Cancer . 2015;113(2):268–274. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms