Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;30(2):269-278.
doi: 10.1177/02601060221111234. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Protocol: The effects of nutrient- vs food- vs food-substitution-based dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and sweet taste outcomes: A randomised controlled trial

Lucy R Boxall  1 , Emily Arden-Close  1 , Janet James  1 , Katherine M Appleton  1
Affiliations

Protocol: The effects of nutrient- vs food- vs food-substitution-based dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and sweet taste outcomes: A randomised controlled trial

Lucy R Boxall et al. Nutr Health. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Dietary guidelines are intended to inform and aid the general public, with the aim of improving healthy diets and reducing health risk. The effectiveness of these guidelines, however, is rarely investigated.

Aim: This work investigates the effects of three different types of dietary recommendations for reducing free sugars, on free sugar intakes over 12 weeks. Secondary aims will also investigate how these different recommendations affect secondary outcomes, outcomes in subsets of the trial population, and identify barriers and facilitators to dietary change.

Methods: Using a randomised controlled parallel-group trial with three intervention and one control arms, 240 individuals consuming >5% total energy intake from free sugars will be randomized to receive: nutrient-based, nutrient- and food-based, nutrient-, food- and food-substitution-based recommendations or no recommendations, with outcomes assessed for the following 12 weeks. Our primary outcomes are free sugar intakes and adherence to the recommendations. Secondary outcomes are daily energy intake, dietary composition, anthropometry, sweet food perceptions and preferences, sweet food choice, attitudes towards sweet foods, eating behaviour and food choice, knowledge and lifestyle variables, quality of life, adverse events, and barriers and facilitators towards intervention adherence.

Results: Data will contribute to three distinct analyses: 1) Analyses to investigate the effects of the three different dietary recommendations versus control; 2) Analyses of the effects of the dietary recommendations in different population subgroups, and 3) Investigation of the barriers and facilitators to success.

Conclusion: This work offers new perspectives on the effects of different dietary recommendations to enact behaviour change.

Keywords: Food-based dietary guidelines; dietary intakes; individual differences; randomised controlled trial; sugars; taste profiles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This trial is part of a PhD studentship, funded by Bournemouth University, UK, and The International Sweeteners Association (ISA), BE.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, et al.. (2019) Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. The Lancet 393(10184). Lancet Publishing Group: 1958–1972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmad A, Isherwood C, Umpleby M, et al.. (2020) Effects of high and low sugar diets on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 66(Supplement). Center for Academic Publications Japan: S18–S24. - PubMed
    1. Appleton KM, Rajska J, Warwick SM, et al. (2022) No effects of sweet taste exposure at breakfast for 3 weeks on pleasantness, desire for, sweetness or intake of other sweet foods: A randomised controlled trial. Brit J Nutr 127: 1428–1438. - PubMed
    1. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Fast K, et al.. (2002) Labeled scales (e.g. category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference 14(2). Elsevier Ltd: 125–138.
    1. Bartoshuk LM, Fast K, Snyder DJ. (2005) Differences in our sensory worlds invalid comparisons with labeled scales. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14(3): 122–125.

Publication types