Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):173-183.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9600.

Trends in Adverse Event Rates in Hospitalized Patients, 2010-2019

Affiliations

Trends in Adverse Event Rates in Hospitalized Patients, 2010-2019

Noel Eldridge et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Patient safety is a US national priority, yet lacks a comprehensive assessment of progress over the past decade.

Objective: To determine the change in the rate of adverse events in hospitalized patients.

Design, setting, and participants: This serial cross-sectional study used data from the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System from 2010 to 2019 to assess in-hospital adverse events in patients. The study included 244 542 adult patients hospitalized in 3156 US acute care hospitals across 4 condition groups from 2010 through 2019: acute myocardial infarction (17%), heart failure (17%), pneumonia (21%), and major surgical procedures (22%); and patients hospitalized from 2012 through 2019 for all other conditions (22%).

Exposures: Adults aged 18 years or older hospitalized during each included calendar year.

Main outcomes and measures: Information on adverse events (abstracted from medical records) included 21 measures across 4 adverse event domains: adverse drug events, hospital-acquired infections, adverse events after a procedure, and general adverse events (hospital-acquired pressure ulcers and falls). The outcomes were the total change over time for the observed and risk-adjusted adverse event rates in the subpopulations.

Results: The study sample included 190 286 hospital discharges combined in the 4 condition-based groups of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, and major surgical procedures (mean age, 68.0 [SD, 15.9] years; 52.6% were female) and 54 256 hospital discharges for the group including all other conditions (mean age, 57.7 [SD, 20.7] years; 59.8% were female) from 3156 acute care hospitals across the US. From 2010 to 2019, the total change was from 218 to 139 adverse events per 1000 discharges for acute myocardial infarction, from 168 to 116 adverse events per 1000 discharges for heart failure, from 195 to 119 adverse events per 1000 discharges for pneumonia, and from 204 to 130 adverse events per 1000 discharges for major surgical procedures. From 2012 to 2019, the rate of adverse events for all other conditions remained unchanged at 70 adverse events per 1000 discharges. After adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics, the annual change represented by relative risk in all adverse events per 1000 discharges was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94) for acute myocardial infarction, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.96) for heart failure, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) for pneumonia, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.94) for major surgical procedures, and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) for all other conditions. The risk-adjusted adverse event rates declined significantly in all patient groups for adverse drug events, hospital-acquired infections, and general adverse events. For patients in the major surgical procedures group, the risk-adjusted rates of events after a procedure declined significantly.

Conclusions and relevance: In the US between 2010 and 2019, there was a significant decrease in the rates of adverse events abstracted from medical records for patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, and major surgical procedures and there was a significant decrease in the adjusted rates of adverse events between 2012 and 2019 for all other conditions. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which these trends represent a change in patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Metersky reported working on various quality improvement and patient safety projects with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and that his employer received remuneration for this work. Mss Eckenrode and Mathew and Drs Drye and Krumholz reported being under contract through Yale New Haven Hospital with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to support quality measurement programs. Dr Brady reported serving as a designated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality representative to the board of directors of the National Quality Forum; as an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality liaison to (1) the Committee on Performance Measurement of the National Committee on Quality Assurance and (2) the advisory committee for the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine, the Coalition to Improve Diagnosis; and serving as co-chair of the National Steering Committee for Patient Safety (convened by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement). Dr Drye reported having a contract with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and transitioning to chief scientific officer at the National Quality Forum after the manuscript was submitted. Dr Krumholz reported receiving (within the last 3 years) expenses and/or personal fees from UnitedHealth, Element Science, Aetna, Reality Labs, Tesseract/4Catalyst, F-Prime, the Siegfried and Jensen Law Firm, the Arnold and Porter Law Firm, and the Martin/Baughman Law Firm; being a co-founder of Refactor Health, an enterprise health care artificial intelligence–augmented data management company, and HugoHealth, a personal health information platform; and is associated with contracts through Yale University from Johnson & Johnson. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Observed Adverse Event Rates by the 4 Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System Adverse Event Domains
The circles denote the observed values and the lines represent the trends over time. Additional information appears in eTable 15 in the Supplement. aData were not available for 2010 and 2011.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Total Change in the Observed Rates for All 21 Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System Adverse Events
The circles denote observed values and the lines represent the trends over time. aData were not available for 2010 and 2011.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Adjusted Relative Risks for the Number of Adverse Events per 1000 Discharges by the 5 Condition Groups
The relative risks were adjusted for age, sex, and race and ethnicity; Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System–specific comorbidities; and hospital characteristics. For acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, and major surgical procedures, the reference year was 2010; for all other conditions, the reference year was 2012 and data from 2010 and 2011 were not available (NA). The x-axis is on a log scale.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Risk-Adjusted Annual Trends by the 5 Condition Groups and the 4 Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System Adverse Event Domains
The relative risks were adjusted for age, sex, and race and ethnicity; Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System–specific comorbidities; and hospital characteristics. Additional information appears in eTable 16 in the Supplement.

Comment in

References

    1. Institute of Medicine . To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Published November 1999. Accessed June 17, 2022. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/9728/To-Err-is-Human-1999--re...
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . Making Healthcare Safer III. Published April 2020. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/making-healthcare-safer/mhs3/inde...
    1. Shojania KG, Thomas EJ. Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving? BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(4):273-277. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001935 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Singh H. Two decades since To Err Is Human: an assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(11):1736-1743. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB, Hackbarth AD, Goldmann DA, Sharek PJ. Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(22):2124-2134. Published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2573. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1004404 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms