Standardising the management of open extremity fractures: a scoping review of national guidelines
- PMID: 35819519
- PMCID: PMC10276057
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03324-w
Standardising the management of open extremity fractures: a scoping review of national guidelines
Abstract
Introduction: Open extremity fractures can be life-changing events. Clinical guidelines on the management of these injuries aim to standardise the care of patients by presenting evidence-based recommendations. We performed a scoping systematic review to identify all national clinical practice guidelines published to date.
Materials and methods: A PRISMA-compliant scoping systematic review was designed to identify all national or federal guidelines for the management of open fractures, with no limitations for language or publication date. EMBASE and MEDLINE database were searched. Article screening and full-text review was performed in a blinded fashion in parallel by two authors.
Results: Following elimination of duplicates, 376 individual publications were identified and reviewed. In total, 12 clinical guidelines were identified, authored by groups in the UK, USA, the Netherlands, Finland, and Malawi. Two of these focused exclusively on antibiotic prophylaxis and one on combat-related injuries, with the remaining nine presented wide-scope recommendations with significant content overlap.
Discussion: Clinical practice guidelines serve clinicians in providing evidence-based and cost-effective care. We only identified one open fractures guideline developed in a low- or middle-income country, from Malawi. Even though the development of these guidelines can be time and resource intensive, the benefits may outweigh the costs by standardising the care offered to patients in different healthcare settings. International collaboration may be an alternative for adapting guidelines to match local resources and healthcare systems for use across national borders.
Keywords: Guidelines; Lower extremity; Lower limb; Open fractures; Plastic surgery; Trauma.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
JN co-authored and edited the 2009 and 2020 BAPRAS/BOA guidelines. All other authors have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
International guidelines for groin hernia management.Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Hernia. 2018. PMID: 29330835 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Management of Open Fractures: A Systematic Survey of Current Practice and Recommendations.JBJS Rev. 2019 Feb;7(2):e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00197. JBJS Rev. 2019. PMID: 30724762
-
Surgical Infection Society guideline: prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures: an evidence-based guideline.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006 Aug;7(4):379-405. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.379. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006. PMID: 16978082 Review.
Cited by
-
A Scoping Review on the Management of Open Fractures in African Trauma and Orthopaedics Centres.Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68925. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68925. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39381475 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Outcomes in Mangled Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Insights from a Retrospective Study of 93 Patients and Their Functional Scores.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):1436. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051436. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40094922 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources