Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis
- PMID: 35820852
- PMCID: PMC9277786
- DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02524-6
Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis
Abstract
Background: Opaque bubble layer (OBL), which generates from photo-disruptive procedures on the cornea, has been a common phenomenon during femtosecond laser-assisted refractive surgeries and it would potentially impact eye tracking and flap lifting. And we have observed that an updated flap-making pattern could form less OBL clinically than the traditional pattern, which needed further approval. Thus, the purpose of this study is to prove our observation and investigate the possible risk factors related to the occurrence and type of OBL in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps using the Visumax laser system.
Methods: This prospective study included 167 eyes of 86 patients (mean age: 27.5 ± 6.1 years) undergoing bilateral femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia/myopic astigmatism by the same surgeon from April 2020 to August 2020. Preoperative data on refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), and keratometry as well as intraoperative data were included for analysis. A new flap-making pattern creating an offset between flap-cut and side-cut was adopted to compare with the traditional pattern. The operation video of flap formation was analyzed to identify the existence and type of OBL. The area covered by OBL and the ratio of OBL to flap were calculated using Image J software.
Results: Among 167 eyes, 54 eyes (32.3%) developed OBLs, consisting of 31 as hard OBL coexisting with soft OBL, and 23 as soft OBL alone. The OBL incidence was significantly reduced in eyes with the new flap-making pattern compared with the traditional pattern (13.8% vs. 52.5%, P < 0.001). Hard OBLs had larger area ratios than soft OBLs (14.3 ± 8.3% vs. 1.1 ± 1.8%, P < 0.001). Univariate analyses revealed that eyes with more myopia, thicker CCT, and traditional flap-making patterns were more likely to develop OBLs. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that more myopia, thicker CCT, and traditional flap-making pattern were risk factors for OBLs. A Larger corneal diameter was associated with a higher incidence of hard OBL when applying the traditional flap-making process.
Conclusion: More myopia, thicker CCT, and larger corneal diameter were risk factors for OBL development during flap creation, whereas a flap-making pattern with an offset between flap-cut and side-cut could reduce the incidence of OBL.
Keywords: FS-LASIK; Opaque bubble layer; Risk factors.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Technique to Reduce Incidence of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation During LASIK Flap Creation Using the VisuMax Femtosecond Laser.J Refract Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(9):584-590. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-06. J Refract Surg. 2017. PMID: 28880332
-
Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters.Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):635-641. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0323-3. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Int Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27518898
-
Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1925-1931. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38091059
-
[Complications of femto-LASIK and features of cavitation injuries].Vestn Oftalmol. 2023;139(3):119-125. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2023139031119. Vestn Oftalmol. 2023. PMID: 37379118 Review. Russian.
-
Developing an OBL: Key Considerations Before Spending a Dime Or Too Much Time.Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Mar;27(1):100950. doi: 10.1016/j.tvir.2024.100950. Epub 2024 Apr 27. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39025611 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting an opaque bubble layer during small-incision lenticule extraction surgery based on deep learning.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Oct 30;12:1487482. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1487482. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024. PMID: 39539961 Free PMC article.
-
Based on TransRes-Pix2Pix network to generate the OBL image during SMILE surgery.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 May 21;13:1598475. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1598475. eCollection 2025. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025. PMID: 40469419 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gros-Otero J, Rodriguez-Perez I, Teus MA, Katsanos A, Mikropoulos DG, Garcia-Gonzalez M. Myopic LASIK outcomes: comparison of three different femtosecond lasers and a mechanical microkeratome using the same excimer laser. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11(3):1047–1066. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00486-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous