Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 12;21(1):124.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01017-z.

Barthel Index is a valid and reliable tool to measure the functional independence of cancer patients in palliative care

Affiliations

Barthel Index is a valid and reliable tool to measure the functional independence of cancer patients in palliative care

Vinício Dos Santos Barros et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to verify the reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the Barthel Index in Brazilian cancer patients in palliative care.

Methods: We included patients with cancer, both sexes, and age greater than or equal to 18 years. We used to evaluate patients the Barthel Index, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and European Organization for Research in the Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire-core 15 (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL). The measurement properties evaluated in this study were test-retest and inter-rater reliability and construct validity (tested by means of correlations with other instruments).

Results: We included 220 patients for construct validity and a subsample of 27 patients for reliability analyses. We observed adequate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.962) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.942). There were adequate correlations between the Barthel Index and the KPS (rho = 0.766), and the functional capacity domain of the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL (rho = -0.698).

Conclusion: The Brazilian version of the Barthel Index presents adequate test-retest and inter-rater reliability, acceptable internal consistency, and valid construct for measuring functional independence in cancer patients.

Keywords: Cancer; Functional capacity; Surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland–Altman plot of agreement between test–retest measures (n = 27)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bland–Altman plot of agreement between inter-rater measures (n = 27)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. dos Santos Barros V, Bassi-Dibai D, Pontes-Silva A, Barros LSL, Rêgo AS, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes CA, et al. Short-form quality care questionnaire-palliative care has acceptable measurement properties in Brazilian cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung V, Sun V, Ruel N, Smith TJ, Ferrell BR. Improving Palliative Care and Quality of Life in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. J Palliat Med. 2021 doi: 10.1089/JPM.2021.0187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morishima T, Sato A, Nakata K, Matsumoto Y, Koeda N, Shimada H, et al. Barthel Index-based functional status as a prognostic factor in young and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed gastric, colorectal and lung cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang TJ. Concept analysis of functional status. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41:457–462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.09.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mor V , Laliberte L, Morris J, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984;53:2002–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<2002::AID-CNCR2820530933>3.0.CO;2-W. - DOI - PubMed