Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 12;5(1):91.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00625-6.

Multi-center validation of machine learning model for preoperative prediction of postoperative mortality

Affiliations

Multi-center validation of machine learning model for preoperative prediction of postoperative mortality

Seung Wook Lee et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality is important for not only successful postoperative patient care but also for information-based shared decision-making with patients and efficient allocation of medical resources. This study aimed to create a machine-learning prediction model for 30-day mortality after a non-cardiac surgery that adapts to the manageable amount of clinical information as input features and is validated against multi-centered rather than single-centered data. Data were collected from 454,404 patients over 18 years of age who underwent non-cardiac surgeries from four independent institutions. We performed a retrospective analysis of the retrieved data. Only 12-18 clinical variables were used for model training. Logistic regression, random forest classifier, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural network methods were applied to compare the prediction performances. To reduce overfitting and create a robust model, bootstrapping and grid search with tenfold cross-validation were performed. The XGBoost method in Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) data delivers the best performance in terms of the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) (0.9376) and the area under the precision-recall curve (0.1593). The predictive performance was the best when the SNUH model was validated with Ewha Womans University Medical Center data (AUROC, 0.941). Preoperative albumin, prothrombin time, and age were the most important features in the model for each hospital. It is possible to create a robust artificial intelligence prediction model applicable to multiple institutions through a light predictive model using only minimal preoperative information that can be automatically extracted from each hospital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms for postoperative 30-day mortality predictions.
AUROC (a) and AUPRC (b) of several models for postoperative 30-day mortality in the SNUH dataset. The values of AUROC and AUPRC are presented as 95% confidence intervals. AUROC area under receiver operating characteristic curve, AUPRC area under precision-recall curve, DNN deep neural network, XGB extreme gradient boosting, RF random forest, LR logistic regression, ASA-PS American society of anesthesiologists physical status classification.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Feature-importance of each hospital model with respect to SHAP value.
a SNUH model, b AMC model, c EUMC model, d BRMH model. SHAP Shapley additive explanations, SNUH Seoul National University Hospital, AMC Asan Medical Center, EUMC Ewha Womans University Medical Center, BRMH Boramae Hospital.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of external validation of each hospital model.
SNUH Seoul National University Hospital, AMC Asan Medical Center, EUMC Ewha Womans University Medical Center, BRMH Boramae Hospital.

References

    1. Weiser TG, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet. 2015;385:S11. - PubMed
    1. Alkire BC, et al. Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health. 2015;3:e316–e323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stephenson C, et al. Management of common postoperative complications. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020;95:2540–2554. - PubMed
    1. Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, Vincent CA. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am. J. Surg. 2013;206:253–262. - PubMed
    1. Brennan TA, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical practice study I. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;324:370–376. - PubMed