Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 16:2:719010.
doi: 10.3389/fragi.2021.719010. eCollection 2021.

Stem Cells in the Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Affiliations
Review

Stem Cells in the Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Di Zhan et al. Front Aging. .

Abstract

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a group of clonal disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, resulting in peripheral cytopenias and frequent transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We and others have demonstrated that MDS arises in, and is propagated by malignant stem cells (MDS-SCs), that arise due to the sequential acquisition of genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). This review focuses on recent advancements in the cellular and molecular characterization of MDS-SCs, as well as their role in mediating MDS clinical outcomes. In addition to discussing the cell surface proteins aberrantly upregulated on MDS-SCs that have allowed the identification and prospective isolation of MDS-SCs, we will discuss the recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities and genetic mutations present in MDS-SCs and their roles in initiating disease, including recent studies demonstrating patterns of clonal evolution and disease progression from pre-malignant HSCs to MDS-SCs. We also will discuss the pathways that have been described as drivers or promoters of disease, including hyperactivated innate immune signaling, and how the identification of these alterations in MDS-SC have led to investigations of novel therapeutic strategies to treat MDS. It is important to note that despite our increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of MDS, the molecular mechanisms that drive responses to therapy remain poorly understood, especially the mechanisms that underlie and distinguish hematologic improvement from reductions in blast burden. Ultimately, such distinctions will be required in order to determine the shared and/or unique molecular mechanisms that drive ineffective hematopoiesis, MDS-SC maintenance, and leukemic transformation.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; clonal hematopoiesis; hematopoietic stem cells; myelodysplastic syndromes; novel therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cellular and genetic hierarchies and disease progression in MDS. (A) In healthy individuals, hemotopoiesis is charcterzied as a hierarchy in which self-renewing HSCs give rise to non-self-renewal multipotent and commited progintors and eventually mature cells. When aged HSCs acquire somatic mutations and give rise clones with enhanced self-renewal (yellow), thsi is detectable in the peripheral blood as clonal hematopoiesis (CH), which often characterized by mutations in genes such as DMNT3a, TET, and ASXL1. (B) when HSCs harboring CH associated mutations acquire additional mutations in genes such as U2AF1, SRF2, and SF3B1, this leads to the formation of MSD stem cells, MDS-SCs (green). In low-risk MDS, disease stem cells immunophenotypically resemble normal HSCs, while in high-risk disease with excess blasts, resmbles committed myeloid progenitors. (C) It is presumed that acquisitions of lesions such as FLT3 and NRAS mutations in HSCs or committed proginitors drive the formation of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) and non-self-renewing blasts that accumalate in high-risk MDS and sAML. LSCs immunophenotypically resemble committed progenitors. (curved blue arrow = self-renewal).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdel-Wahab O., Gao J., Adli M., Dey A., Trimarchi T., Chung Y. R., et al. (2013). Deletion of Asxl1 Results in Myelodysplasia and Severe Developmental Defects In Vivo . J. Exp. Med. 210 (12), 2641–2659. 10.1084/jem.20131141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ågerstam H., Karlsson C., Hansen N., Sandén C., Askmyr M., von Palffy S., et al. (2015). Antibodies Targeting Human IL1RAP (IL1R3) Show Therapeutic Effects in Xenograft Models of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 (34), 10786–10791. 10.1073/pnas.1422749112 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkharabsheh O., Frankel A. E. (2019). Clinical Activity and Tolerability of SL-401 (Tagraxofusp): Recombinant Diphtheria Toxin and Interleukin-3 in Hematologic Malignancies. Biomedicines 7 (1). 10.3390/biomedicines7010006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allampallam K., Shetty V., Mundle S., Dutt D., Kravitz H., Reddy P. L., et al. (2002). Biological Significance of Proliferation, Apoptosis, Cytokines, and Monocyte/macrophage Cells in Bone Marrow Biopsies of 145 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Int. J. Hematol. 75 (3), 289–297. 10.1007/bf02982044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai F., Hirao A., Ohmura M., Sato H., Matsuoka S., Takubo K., et al. (2004). Tie2/angiopoietin-1 Signaling Regulates Hematopoietic Stem Cell Quiescence in the Bone Marrow Niche. Cell 118 (2), 149–161. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.004 - DOI - PubMed